Impact of measurement errors in stochastic inverse conditional modelling by the self-calibrating approach

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 501-511

  Hendricks Franssen, H J W M ^a   Gomez Hernandez J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Conditioning; Heterogeneity; Inverse modeling; Measurement errors; Network design; Self calibrating method

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC MODELS; MEASUREMENT ERRORS;

TRANSMISSIVITY;

WATER RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC TRANSPORT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; STOCHASTIC METHOD;

CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC HEAD; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NETWORK DESIGN; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 0037402590     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1708(03)00009-5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Carrera J, Neuman SP. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 3. Application to synthetic and field data. Water Resour Res 1986;2(22):228-42.
2. Kitanidis PK, Vomvoris EG. A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations. Water Resour Res 1983;3(19):677-90.
3. Anderman ER, Hill MC. A new multistage groundwater transport inverse method: Presentation, evaluation and implications. Water Resour Res 1999;35(4):1053-63.
4. Sun NZ, Yang S, Yeh WG. A proposed stepwise regression method for model structure identification. Water Resour Res 1998;34(10):2561-72.
5. Finsterle S, Najita J. Robust estimation of hydrogeologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 1998;34(11):2939-47.
6. Sahuquillo A, Capilla JE, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Andreu J. Conditional simulation of transmissivity fields honoring piezometric data. In: Blain WR, Cabrera A, editors. Hydraulic engineering software IV, fluid flow modeling. 1992. p. 201-14.
7. Gómez-Hernández JJ, Sahuquillo A, Capilla JE. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data. 1. Theory. J Hydrol 1997;203(1-4):162-74.
8. Capilla J, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Sahuquillo A. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data. 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer. J Hydrol 1997;203(1-4):175-88.
9. Hendricks Franssen HJWM, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Sahuquillo A, Capilla JE. Joint simulation of transmissivity and storativity fields conditional to hydraulic head data. Adv Water Resour Res 1999;23:1-13.
10. Hendricks Franssen HJWM. Inverse stochastic modelling of groundwater flow and mass transport. Ph.D thesis, Technical University of Valencia, 2001.
11. Gómez-Hernández JJ, Srivastava RM. ISIM3D: an ANSI-C three dimensional multiple indicator conditional simulation program. Comput Geosci 1990;16(4): 395-400.
12. Gómez-Hernández JJ, Journel AG. Joint sequential simulation of multi-Gaussian fields. In: Soares A, editor. Geostatistics tróiá 92, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993. p. 85-94.
13. LaVenue AM, RamaRao BS, de Marsily G, Marietta MG. Pilot point methodology to automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields. 2. Application. Water Resour Res 1995;31(3 ):495-516.
14. Carrera J, Navarrina F, Vives L, Heredia J, Medina A. Computational aspects of the inverse problem. In: Gambolati G et al., editors. Computational methods in surface hydrology. Southampton, Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1990.