Reproducibility of functional MR imaging results using two different MR systems

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 652-657

  Vlieger, Erik Jan ^a   Lavini, Cristina ^b   Majoie, Charles B ^b   Den Heeten, Gerard J ^b  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AVERAGE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; MACHINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037393652     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lee CC, Ward HA, Sharbrough FW, et al. Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1511-1519
2. Ruge MI, Victor J, Hosain S, et al. Concordance between functional magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative language mapping. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72:95-102
3. Beisteiner R, Lanzenberger R, Novak K, et al. Improvement of presurgical patient evaluation by generation of functional magnetic resonance risk maps. Neurosci Lett 2000;290:13-16
4. Hirsch J, Ruge MI, Kim KH, et al. An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions. Neurosurgery 2000;47:711-21, discussion 721-2.
5. Yetkin FZ, McAulie TL, Cox R, Haughton VM. Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:95-98
6. Moser E, Teichtmeister C, Diemling M. Reproducibility and post-processing of gradient-echo functional MRI to improve localization of brain activity in the human visual cortex. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:567-579
7. Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Valk J, Scheltens P. Test-retest analysis with functional MR of the activated area in the human visual cortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1317-1322
8. Genovese CR, Noll DC, Eddy WF. Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging. I: statistical methodology. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:497-507
9. Noll DC, Genovese CR, Nystrom LE, et al. Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging. II: application to motor and cognitive activation studies. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:508-517
10. Le TH, Hu X. Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI. NMR Biomed 1997;10:160-164
11. Baumgartner R, Scarth G, Teichtmeister C, Somorjai R, Moser E. Fuzzy clustering of gradient-echo functional MRI in the human visual cortex. I: reproducibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:1094-1101
12. Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Scheltens P. Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:105-113
13. Cohen MS, DuBois RM. Stability, repeatability, and the expression of signal magnitude in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:33-40
14. Machielsen WC, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Witter MP. FMRI of visual encoding: reproducibility of activation. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;9:156-164
15. McGonigle DJ, Howseman AM, Athwal BS, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Holmes AP. Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000;11:708-734
16. Miki A, Raz J, van Erp TG, Liu CS, Haselgrove JC, Liu GT. Reproducibility of visual activation in functional MR imaging and effects of postprocessing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:910-915
17. Miki A, Raz J, Englander SA, et al. Reproducibility of visual activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging at very high field strength (4 tesla). Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:1-4
18. Miki A, Liu GT, Englander SA, et al. Reproducibility of visual activation during checkerboard stimulation in functional magnetic resonance imaging at 4 tesla. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:151-155
19. Eddy WF, Fitzgerald M, Noll DC. Improved image registration by using Fourier interpolation. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:923-931
20. Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W. The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. Eur J Neurosci 1998;10:1563-1573
21. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:636-647
22. Schmithorst VJ, Dardzinski BJ, Holland SK. Simultaneous correction of ghost and geometric distortion artifacts in EPI using a multiecho reference scan. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:535-539
23. Jenkinson M. Improved unwarping of EPI volumes using regularised B0 maps. Human Brain Mapping Brighton UK 2001
24. Krings T, Schreckenberger M, Rohde V, et al. Metabolic and electrophysiological validation of functional MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:762-771
25. Yetkin FZ, Mueller WM, Morris GL, et al. Functional MR activation correlated with intraoperative cortical mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1311-1315