Incorporation of environmental factors into outcomes research

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 125-129

  Kuipers, Pim ^a   Foster, Michele M ^a   Bellamy, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Disability; Environment; ICF; Outcome measurement; Social ecology

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DISABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REVIEW; WELLBEING; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0037390633     PISSN: 14737167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.3.2.125     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA (1951).
2. Bandura A. The self-system in reciprocal determinisim. Am. Psychol. 33, 344-358 (1978).
3. Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 23(13), 559-569 (2001).
4. Kuipers P, Pershouse K, Amsters D, Price G. Long-term adjustment to spinal cord injury: Partial support for an Episodic Stress Response Model and implications for outcome measurement. Soc. Sci. Med. (under review).
5. Verbrugge L, Jette A. The disablement process. Soc. Sci. Med. 38(1), 1-14 (1994).
6. Corcoran M, Gitlin L. The role of the physical environment in occupational performance. In: Occupational Therapy: Enabling Function and Well-being. Christiansen CH, Baum CM (Eds). Thorofare, NJ, USA (1997).
7. Kuipers P, Kennedy A, Smith S. Networks of support: adapting the 'circles' approach to formal community based, acquired brain injury rehabilitation. J. Cogn. Rehabil. 17(4), 2-5 (1999).
8. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO (2001).
9. Gray D.B, Hendershot G. The ICIDH-2: Developments for a new era of outcomes Research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, S10-S14.
10. Fougeyrollas P, Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil. Rehabil. 17 (3/4), 145-153.
11. Fougeyrollas P. Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: Theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 7(3), 1-16 (2002).
12. Bickenbach J, Chatterji S, Badley E, Ustun T. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 1173-1187 (1999).
13. Anderson E. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, S15-S20 (2000).
14. Kuipers P. Community based rehabilitation: context parameters and potential. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia (1998).
15. Law M, Mills J. Client-centred occupational therapy. In: Client-centered occupational therapy. Law M (Ed.). Thorofare, NJ, USA (1998).
16. Yoder L, Wojner AW. Outcomes measurement for outcomes management. In: Outcomes Management: Applications to Clinical Practice. Wojner AW (Ed.). St. Louis, MO, USA (2001).
17. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Health Administration Press (1980).
18. Steinfeld E, Danford GS. Theory as a basis for research on enabling environments. In: Enabling Environments: Measuring the Impact of Environment on Disability and Rehabilitation. Steinfeld E, Danford GS. (Eds). New York, USA, (1999).
19. Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 367-374 (2001).
20. Lang NM, Marek KD. Outcomes that reflect clinical practice. Patient outcomes research: examining the effectiveness of nursing practice. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services (1992).
21. Madden C. Participation and environment: Out of the melting pot and into... Paper presented at the International seminar on the measurement of disability. United Nations Statistics Division, June 4-6, New York, USA (2001).
22. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge Press, Harvard, MA, USA (1979).
23. Berry JO. Families and deinstitutionalisaton: an application of Bronfenbrenner's social ecology model. J. Couns. Dev. 73(2), 379-383 (1995).
24. O'Day B. Research on the lives of persons with disabilities: the emerging importance of qualitative research methodologies. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 13(1), 9-11 (2002).
25. Spencer JC. The usefulness of qualitative methods in rehabilitation: Issues of meaning, of context, and of change. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74(2), 119-126 (1993).
26. Hahn H, Pool Hegamin A. Assessing scientific measures of disability. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 12(2), 114-121 (2001).
27. Wachs TD. Celebrating complexity: conceptualisation and assessment of the environment. In: Measuring Environment across the Life Span. Emerging Methods and Concepts. Friedman SL, Wachs TD (Eds). Washington, DC, USA (1999).
28. Madden R. The new WHO classification model-ICF (ICIDH-2). Paper presented at Disability and Policy in the 21st Century: Refocus on an old issue. National Paediatric Physiotherapy Conference, Melbourne (2001).
29. Barber N. Should we consider noncompliance a medical error? Qual. Saf. Health Care 11(1), 81-85 (2002).