Developmental changes in membrane excitability and morphology of neurons in the nucleus angularis of the chicken

Journal of Physiology

Volumn 548, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 219-232

  Fukui, Iwao ^a   Ohmori, Harunori ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,1' DIOCTADECYL 3,3,3',3' TETRAMETHYLINDOCARBOCYANINE; BIOCYTIN; DENDROTOXIN; POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; TETRYLAMMONIUM CHLORIDE;

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; CHICKEN; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; HATCHING; HYPERPOLARIZATION; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; POTASSIUM CURRENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND INTENSITY; SPIKE WAVE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; COCHLEAR NERVE; DENDRITE; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MEMBRANE DEPOLARIZATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE EXCITABILITY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CELL MEMBRANE; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; ELAPID VENOMS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; LYSINE; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; NERVE FIBERS; NEURONS; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; TETRAETHYLAMMONIUM;

EID: 0037383470     PISSN: 00223751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.036285     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Banks MI & Sachs MB (1991). Regularity analysis in a compartmental model of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 65, 606-629.
2. Boord RL & Rasmussen GL (1963). Projection of the cochlear and lagenar nerves on the cochlear nuclei of the pigeon. J Comp Neurol 120, 463-475.
3. Brainard MS, Knudsen EI & Esterly SD (1992). Neural derivation of sound source location: resolution of spatial ambiguities in binaural cues. J Acoust Soc Am 91, 1015-1027.
4. + conductances with complementary functions in postsynaptic integration at a central auditory synapse. J Neurosci 15, 8011-8022.
5. + channels. Ann N Y Acad Sci 868, 233-285.
6. + channels in sustained high-frequency firing of fast-spiking neocortical interneurons. J Neurophysiol 82, 2476-2489.
7. + channels, types Kv1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, and 3.1, stably expressed in mammalian cell lines. Mol Pharmacol 45, 1227-1234.
8. Harvey AL (2001). Twenty years of dendrotoxins. Toxicon 39, 15-26.
9. Häusler UH, Sullivan WE, Soares D & Carr CE (1999). A morphological study of the cochlear nuclei of the pigeon (Columba livia). Brain Behav Evol 54, 290-302.
10. + currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes by mKv1.1, mKv1.2 and their heteromultimers as revealed by mutagenesis of the dendrotoxin-binding site in mKv1.1. Pflugers Arch 428, 382-390.
11. Hotta T (1971). Unit responses from the nucleus angularis in the pigeon's medulla. Comp Biochem Physiol A 40, 415-424.
12. Jhaveri S & Morest DK (1982a). Neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken auditory system with observations on nucleus laminaris: a light and electron microscope study. Neuroscience 7, 809-836.
13. Jhaveri S & Morest DK (1982b). Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: a golgi study. Neuroscience 7, 837-853.
14. Jhaveri S & Morest DK (1982c). Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: an electron microscope study. Neuroscience 7, 855-870.
15. Kanemasa T, Gan L, Perney TM, Wang LY & Kaczmarek LK (1995). Electrophysiological and pharmacological characterization of a mammalian Shaw channel expressed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. J Neurophysiol 74, 207-217.
16. Konishi M (1970). Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Zeitschrift fur vergleichende Physiologie 66, 257-272.
17. Köppl C (2001). Tonotopic projections of the auditory nerve to the cochlear nucleus angularis in the barn owl. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2, 41-53.
18. Knudsen EI & Konishi M (1978). A neural map of auditory space in the owl. Science 200, 795-797.
19. + channel proteins. J Neurosci 20, 9071-9085.
20. Manley GA, Köppl C & Konishi M (1988). A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 8, 2665-2676.
21. + channels of fast-spiking interneurons and pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 18, 8111-8125.
22. Massengill JL, Smith MA, Son DI & O'Dowd DK (1997). Differential expression of K4-AP currents and Kv3.1 potassium channel transcripts in cortical neurons that develop distinct firing phenotypes. J Neurosci 17, 3136-3147.
23. Mogdans J & Knudsen EI (1994). Representation of interaural level difference in the VLVp, the first site of binaural comparison in the barn owl's auditory system. Hear Res 74, 148-164.
24. Moiseff A & Konishi M (1983). Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields. J Neurosci 3, 2553-2562.
25. Oertel D, Wu SH & Hirsch JA (1988). Electrical characteristics of cells and neuronal circuitry in the cochlear nuclei studied with intracellular recordings from brain slices. In Auditory Function, ed. Edelman GM, Gall WE & Cowan WM, pp. 313-336. Wiley, New York.
26. Perney TM, Marshall J, Martin KA, Hockfield S & Kaczmarek LK (1992). Expression of the mRNAs for the Kv3.1 potassium channel gene in the adult and developing rat brain. J Neurophysiol 68, 756-766.
27. Perney TM & Kaczmarek LK (1997). Localization of a high threshold potassium channel in the rat cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol 386, 178-202.
28. Rathouz M & Trussell L (1998). Characterization of outward currents in neurons of the avian nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurophysiol 80, 2824-2835.
29. Reyes AD, Rubel EW & Spain WJ (1994). Membrane properties underlying the firing of neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 14, 5352-5364.
30. Rudy B, Chow A, Lau D, Amarillo Y, Ozaita A, Saganich M, Moreno H, Nadal MS, Hernandez-Pineda R, Hernandez-Cruz A, Erisir A, Leonard C & Vega-Saenz de Miera E (1999). Contributions of Kv3 channels to neuronal excitability. Ann N Y Acad Sci 868, 304-343.
31. Soares D & Carr CE (2001). The cytoarchitecture of the nucleus angularis of the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Comp Neurol 429, 192-205.
32. Soares D, Chitwood RA, Hyson RL & Carr CE (2002). Intrinsic neuronal properties of the chick nucleus angularis. J Neurophysiol 88, 152-162.
33. Sullivan WE & Konishi M (1984). Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4, 1787-1799.
34. Takahashi TT & Konishi M (1988a). Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl. J Comp Neurol 274, 190-211.
35. Takahashi TT & Konishi M (1988b). Projections of nucleus angularis and nucleus laminaris to the lateral lemniscal nuclear complex of the barn owl. J Comp Neurol 274, 212-238.
36. Takahashi T, Moiseff A & Konishi M (1984). Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl. J Neurosci 4, 1781-1786.
37. Wang LY, Gan L, Forsythe ID & Kaczmarek LK (1998). Contribution of the Kv3.1 potassium channel to high-frequency firing in mouse auditory neurones. J Physiol 509, 183-194.
38. Warchol ME & Dallos P (1990). Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A 166, 721-734.
39. + current in rat subthalamic nucleus neurones. J Physiol 527, 493-506.