Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 157, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 643-651

  Doody, Michele Morin ^a   Sigurdson, Alice S ^a   Kampa, Diane ^b   Chimes, Kathleen ^c   Alexander, Bruce H ^b   Ron, Elaine ^a   Tarone, Robert E ^a   Linet, Martha S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c WESTAT   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohort studies; Data collection; Epidemiologic methods; Motivation; Nonresponse; Postal service; Questionnaires; Randomized controlled trials

Indexed keywords

QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; POSTAL SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0037378025     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg033     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Dillman DA. The design and administration of mail surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 1991;17:225-49.
2. Tortora RD, Dillman DA, Rolstein R. Considerations related to how incentives influence survey response. Presented at a symposium on providing incentives to survey respondents, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, October 1-3, 1992.
3. Siemiatycki J, Campbell S. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120:291-301.
4. Heilbrun LK, Nomura A, Stemmermann GN. The effects of non-response in a prospective study of cancer: 15 year follow-up. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:328-38.
5. Wacholder S, McLaughlin JK, Silverman DT, et al. Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1019-28.
6. Bisgard KM, Folsom AR, Hong CP, et al. Mortality and cancer rates in nonrespondents to a prospective study of older women: 5-year follow-up. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:990-1000.
7. Shahar E, Folsom AR, Jackson R. The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates from a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:498-506.
8. Etter JF, Perneger TV. Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1123-8.
9. Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1978.
10. Fox RJ, Crask MR, Kim J. Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opin Q 1988;52:467-91.
11. Church AH. Estimating the effects of incentives on mail response rates: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q 1993;57:62-79.
12. Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2001;20:61-7.
13. Spry VM, Hovell MF, Sallis JG, et al. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:166-72.
14. Perneger TV, Etter JF, Rougemont A. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138:714-22.
15. John EM, Savitz DA. Effect of a monetary incentive on response to a mail survey. Ann Epidemiol 1994;4:231-5.
16. Schweitzer M, Asch DA. Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48: 1325-9.
17. Gilbart E, Kreiger N. Improvement in cumulative response rates following implementation of a financial incentive. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:97-9.
18. Gibson PJ, Koepsell TD, Diehr P, et al. increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid client and other low-income populations. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:1057-62.
19. Kalantar JT, Valley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1117-22.
20. Parkes R, Kreiger N, James B, et al. Effects on subject response of information brochures and small cash incentives in a mail-based case-control study. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10:117-24.
21. Collins RL, Ellickson PL, Hays RD, et al. Effects of incentive size and timing on response rates to a follow-up wave of a longitudinal mailed survey. Eval Rev 2000;24:347-63.
22. Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, St Lawrence JT, et al. The effects of variations in mode of delivery and monetary incentive on physicians' responses to a mailed survey assessing STD practice patterns. Eval Health Prof 2001;24:3-17.
23. Doody MM, Mandel JS, Lubin JH, et al. Mortality among U.S. radiologic technologists, 1926-1990. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:67-75.
24. Yammarino FJ, Skinner SJ, Childers TL. Understanding mail survey response behavior: a meta analysis. Public Opin Q 1990; 55:613-39.
25. Eaker S, Bergström R, Bergström A, et al. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:74-82.
26. Hoffman SC, Burke AE, Helzlsouer K, et al. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148: 1007-11.
27. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among non-respondents in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:1068-71.
28. Del Valle ML, Morgenstern H, Rogstad TL, et al. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eval Health Prof 1997;20:389-406.
29. Maheux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health 1989;79:638-9.
30. Little RE, Davis AK. Effectiveness of various methods of contact and reimbursement on response rates of pregnant women to a mail questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120:161-3.
31. James JM, Bolstering R. Effect of monetary incentives and follow-up on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. Public Opin Q 1990;54:346-61.
32. Finlay J, Thistlethwaite PC. Applying mail response enhancement techniques to health care surveys: a cost-benefit approach. Health Market Q 1992;10:91-102.
33. Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Med Care 1998;36:95-9.
34. Cotterchio M, Kreiger N. The effect of financial incentives on participation in future research. Epidemiology 1998;9:216.
35. Hare S, Price JH, Glynn MG, et al. Increasing return rates of mail survey to exercise professionals using a modest monetary incentive. Percept Mot Skills 1998;86:217-18.
36. Martinson BC, Lazovich D, Lando HA, et al. Effectiveness of monetary incentives for recruiting adolescents to an intervention trial to reduce smoking. Prev Med 2000;31:706-13.
37. Shaw MJ, Beebe TJ, Jensen HL, et al. The use of monetary incentives in a community survey: impact on response rates, data quality, and cost. Health Serv Res 2001;35:1339-46.
38. Van Geest JB, Wynia MK, Cummins DS, et al. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians. Med Care 2001;39:197-201.
39. Lykken DT, Bouchard TJ Jr, McGue M, et al. The Minnesota Twin Family Registry: some initial findings. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1990;39:35-70.
40. Baron G, De Wals P, Milord F. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey. Eval Health Prof 2001;24:47-52.
41. Choi BCK, Pak AWP, Purdham JT. Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiology 1990;1:72-4.
42. Rudy EB, Estok PJ, Kerr ME, et al. Research incentives: money versus gifts. Nurs Res 1994;43:253-5.
43. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002;324: 1183-5.
44. Fiset L, Milgrom P, Tarnal J. Dentist's response to financial incentives in a mail survey of malpractice liability experience. J Public Health Dent 1994;54:68-72.
45. Berk ML, Edwards WS, Gay NL. The use of a prepaid incentive to convert nonresponders on a survey of physicians. Eval Health Prof 1993;16:239-45.
46. Kessler RC, Little RJA, Goves RM. Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidemiol Rev 1995;17:192-204.
47. Slattery ML, Edwards SL, Caan BJ, et al. Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies. Ann Epidemiol 1995;5:245-9.