Interactional context in L2 dialogues

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 389-407

  Wiberg, Eva ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Macro context; Repetition; Scaffolding; Second language acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037363978     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00142-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akman, Varol, 2000. Rethinking context as a social construct. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 743-759.
2. Akman, Varol, Bazzanella, Carla, this issue. The complexity of context: Guest editors' introduction. Journal of Pragmatics.
3. Bartning, Inge, 2000. Gender agreement in L2 French: pre-advanced vs advanced learners. Studia Linguistica 54, 225-237.
4. Bazzanella, Carla, 1997. Repetition in pre-school children's narratives. In: Weigand, E. (Ed.), Dialogue analysis: Units, relations and strategies beyond the sentence. Contributions in Honour of Sorin Stati's 65th birthday. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 29-42.
5. Bazzanella, Carla, On context, dialogue. In: Cmerjková , S., Hoffmannová , O., Müllerová, S. (Eds.), Dialoganalyse Vol 6. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 407-416.
6. Bazzanella, Carla, 1999. Forme di ripetizione e processi di comprensione nella conversazione. In: Galatolo, R., Pallotti, G. (Eds.), La Conversazione Un'introduzione allo Studio dell'Interazione Verbale. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano, pp. 205-226.
7. Bialystok, Ellen, 1991. Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. In: Bialystok, E. (Ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children. 113-140, Cambridge University Press.
8. Bozier, Christine, 2001. Etude des solicitations, données et prise dapprenants suédophones de français. Licenciatavhandling. Petites etudes romanes de Lund Extra seriem 11, Lund.
9. Carli, Augusto, 1999. La mitigazione nella lezione universitaria. In: Ciliberti, A., Anderson, L. (Eds.), Le Forme Della Comunicazione Accademica. Ricerche Linguistiche Sulla Didattica Universitaria in Ambito Umanistico. Franco Angeli, Milano , pp. 84-100.
10. Ciliberti, Anna, 1996. Repetition in native/non-native interaction. In: Bazzanella, C. (Ed.), Repetition in Dialogue. Beiträge zur Dialogforschung, Band Vol 11. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 39-49.
11. Di Pietro, Jean F., Matthey, Marinnette, Py, Bernard, 1989. Acquisition et contrat didactique: les séquences potentiellement acquisitionnelles dans la conversation exolingue. Actes du IIIe colloque régional de linguistique. Université de Sciences Humaines, Strasbourg, pp. 99-124.
12. Ducharme, Daphne, Bernard, Roger, 2001. Communication breakdowns: an exploration of contextualization in native non-native speakers of French. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 825-847.
13. Firth, John R, 1957. Papers in Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
14. Hausendorf, Heiko, Quastho., Uta M., 1992. Patterns of adult-child interaction as a mechanism of discourse acquisition. Journal of Pragmatics 17, 241-259.
15. Heritage, John, 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
16. Hymes, Dell, 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
17. Levelt, Willem, Perspective taking, ellipsisinspatialdescriptions. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (Eds.), Language and Space. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 77-108.
18. Levinson, Stephen C., 1996. Frames of reference Molyneux's question: cross linguistic evidence. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (Eds.), Language and Space. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , pp. 109-170.
19. Linell, Per, 1990. The power of dialogue dynamics. In: Markova, I., Foppa, K. (Eds.), The dynamics of Dialogue. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, pp. 144-177.
20. Linell, Per, Gustavsson, Lennart, 1987. Initiativ och respons. Om dialogens dynamik, dominans och koherens. University of Linköping, Studies in Communication 15, Linköping.
21. Linell, Per, Jönsson, Linda, 1991. Suspect stories: perspective-setting in an asymmetrical situation. In: Marková, I., Foppa, K. (Eds.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, pp. 75-100.
22. MacWhinney, Brian, 1991. The CHILDES Project. Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ.
23. Poulisse, Nanda, 1997. Compensatory strategies the principles of clarity economy. In: Kasper, G., Kellerman, E. (Eds.), Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Longman, London, pp. 49-64.
24. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of uh huh other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, D. (Ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, Ablex, NJ, pp. 71-93.
25. Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre, 1993. Relevance. Cambridge University Press, Harvard, MA .
26. Strodt-Lopez, Barbara, 1991. Tying it all in asides in university lectures. Applied Linguistics 12, 117-140.
27. Talmy, Leonard, 1983. How language structures space. In: Pick, H., Acredolo, L. (Eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 225-282.
28. Tversky, Barbara, 1996. Spatial perspective in descriptions. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (Eds.), Language and Space. MIT Press, Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 463-491.
29. Wiberg, Eva, 2001a. Il modello teorico della quaestio e dati dialogici: sono riconciliabili? In: Leoni, F.A., Krosbakken, E.S., Sornicola, R., Stromboli, C. (Eds.), Dati Empirici e Teorie Linguistiche. Bulzoni, Rome, pp. 129-150.
30. Wiberg, Eva, 2001b. Il riferimento al futuro nel dialogo un confronto tra italofoni e apprendenti di italiano L2. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 30, 59-79.
31. Wiberg, Eva, 2002. Information structure in dialogic future plans: a study of Italian native speakers and Swedish pre-advanced and advanced learners of Italian. In: Salaberry, R., Shirai, Y. (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 281-317.