Cortical index and size of hand bones: Segregation analysis and linkage with the 11q12-13 segment

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Cohen, Zvi ^a   Kalichman, Leonid ^b   Kobyliansky, Eugene ^b   Malkin, Ida ^b   Almog, Eliana ^b   Livshits, Gregory ^b  

^a TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bone geometry; Bone size; Linkage analysis; Segregation analysis; Transmission disequilibrium test (TDT)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 11Q; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GEOMETRY; HAND; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METACARPAL BONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONES OF UPPER EXTREMITY; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 11; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; METACARPUS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, GENETIC; RUSSIA;

EID: 0037355221     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV: Risk factors in osteoporosis. Maturitas, 1998; 16; 30: 229-33
2. McCreadie B, Goldstein SA: Biomechanics of fracture: Is bone mineral density sufficient to assess risk? J Bone Miner Res, 2000; 15: 2305-08
3. Uitterlinden AG: Genetics and genomics of osteoporosis. Reviews of the European Calcif Tissue Society, 2001; 9: 1-16
4. Deng HW, Chen WM, Conway T et al: Determination of bone mineral density of the hip and spine in human pedigrees by genetic and life-style factors. Genet Epidem, 2000; 19: 160-177
5. Deng HW, Deng XT, Xu FH et al: Determination of bone size of the hip, spine and wrist in human pedigrees by genetic and life-style factors. J Clinical Densitometry, 2002; 5: 45-56
6. Livshits G, Karasik D, Kobyliansky E: Complex segregation analysis of the radiographic phalanges bone mineral density and their age-related changes. J Bone Miner Res, 2002; 17: 152-61
7. Livshits G, Trofimov S, Malkin I, Kobyliansky E: Transmission disequilibrium test for hand bone mineral density and 11q 12-13 chromosomal segment. Osteop Internat, 2002; 13: 461-7
8. Flicker L, Faulkner KG, Hopper JL et al: Determinants of hip axis length in women aged 10-89 years: a twin study. Bone, 1996; 18: 41-5
9. Ferrari S, Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Bonjour JP: Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1998; 83: 358-61
10. Karasik D, Ginsburg E, Livshits G et al: Evidence of major gene control of cortical bone loss in human populations. Genet Epidem, 2000; 19: 410-421
11. Ginsburg E, karic-Juric T, Kobyliansky E et al: Evidence on major gene control of cortical index in pedigree data from middle Dalmatia, Croatia. Am J Hum Biol, 2001; 13: 398-408
12. Livshits G, Yakovenko K, Kobyliansky E: Quantitative genetic study of radiographic hand bone size and geometry. Bone, 2003; 32: 191-198
13. Dequeker J: Quantitative radiology: radiogrammetry of cortical bone. Br J Radiol, 1976; 49: 912-20
14. Plato CC, Fox KM, Tobin JD: Skeletal changes in human aging. In: Crews DR, Garruto RM, editors. Biological anthropology and aging. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994; 272-300
15. Kobyliansky E, Livshits G, Karasik D, Vainder M: Comparative analysis of roentgenological methods for age evaluation using hand bones. Antropologie (International Journal of Science of Man), 1996; 34: 277-297
16. Koller DL, Econs MJ, Morin PA et al: Genome screen for QTLs contributing to normal variation in bone mineral density and osteoporosis. J Clin Endoc Metab, 2000; 85: 3116-3120
17. Karasik D, Myers RH. Cupples LA et al: Genome screen for quantitative trait loci contributing to normal variation in bone mineral density: the Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res, 2002; 17: 1718-27
18. Li X, Masinde G, Gu W et al: Genetic dissection of femur breaking strength in a large population of F2 mice: single QTL effects, epistasis, and pleiotropy. Genomics, 2002; 79: 734-740
19. Deng HW, Hen H, Xu FH et al: Several genomic regions potentially containing QTLs for bone size variation were identified in a whole-genome linkage scan. Am J Med Genet, 2002; 113: 29-39
20. Wu YO, Heutink P, de Vries BB et al: Assignment of a second locus for multiple exostoses to the pericentromeric region of chromosome II. Human Molecular Genetics, 1994; 3: 167-171
21. Johnson ML, Gong G, Kimberling Wmmel DB, Recker RB: Linkage of a gene causing high bone mass to human chromosome II (1 1q12-13). Am J Hum Genet, 1997: 60: 6 1326-32
22. Carn G, Koller DL, Peacock M et al: Sibling pair linkage and association studies between peak bone mineral density and the gene locus for the osteoclast-specific subunit (OC 116) of the vacuolar proton pump on chromosome 11p12-13. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002; 87: 3819-24
23. Gong Y, Vikkula M, Boon L et al: Osteoporosis-Pseudoglioma Syndrome, a disorder affecting skeletal strength and vision, is assigned to chromosome region 11q12-13. Am J Hum Genet, 1996; 59: 146-151
24. Heaney C, Shalev H, Elbedour K et al: Human autosomal recessive osteopetrosis maps to 11q 13, a position predicted by comparative mapping of the murine osteosclerosis (oc) mutation. Hum Molec Genet, 1998; 7: 1407-1410
25. Van Hul E. Gram J, Bollerslev J et al: Localization of the gene causing autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type I to chromosome 11q12-13. J Bone Miner Res, 2002; 17: 1111-7
26. Chapman K, Mustafa Z, Irven C et al: Osteoarthritis-susceptibility locus on chromosome 11q, detected by linkage. Am J Hum Genet, 1999; 65: 167-174
27. Kalichman L, Cohen Z, Kobyliansky E, Livshits G: Interrelationship between bone aging traits and basic anthropometric characteristics. Am J Hum Biol, 2002; 14: 380-390
28. Pavlovsky O, Kobyliansky E: Population biology of human aging. Firenze, Italy: Angelo Pontecoroboli Editore. Publishing House, 1997
29. Małkin I, Ginsburg E: Program package for Mendelian analysis of pedigree data (MAN, Version 5 technical report). Tel Aviv University, Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, 2002
30. StatSoft, Statistica for Windows (Computer program manual). Tułsa, OK, 2000
31. Morton NE, MacLean CL: Analysis of family resemblance. III. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1974; 26: 489-503.
32. Elston RC: Segregation analysis. In: Mielke JH, Crawford MH editors. Current developments in anthropometrical genetics. Vol. I. New York: Plenum Press. 1981; 397-54
33. Lalouel JM: Segregation analysis of familial data. The mixed model. In: Morton NE, Rao DC, Lalouel JM, editors. Methods in genetic epidemiology. Basel: Karger Press, 1983; 75-79
34. Beaty TH: Evolving methods in genetic epidemiology. I. Analysis of genetic and environmental factors in family studies. Epidem Rev, 1997; 19: 14-23
35. Ginsburg E, Livshits G: Segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Ann Hum Biol. 1999; 26: 103-29
36. Schaid DJ: Transmission diseqilibrium, family controls, and great expectations. Am J Hum Genet, 1998; 63: 935-941
37. Allison DB: Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 50: 676-690
38. Malkin I, Ginsburg E, Elston R. Increase in power of transmissiondisequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. Genet Epidem, 2002; 23: 234-44
39. Collins A, Morton NE: Mapping a disease locus by allelic association. PNAS, 1998; 95: 1741-45
40. Lonjou C, Andrew C, Richard SA et al: Allelic association under map error and recombinational heterogeneity: A tale of two sites. PNAS, 2000; 95: 11366-370
41. Risch N: Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type 1 diabetes. Am J Hum Genet, 1984; 36: 363-386
42. Risch N: Evolving methods in genetic epidemiology. II Genetic linkage from epidemiologic perspective. Genet Epidem, 1997; 19: 24-32
43. Little RD, Carulli JP, Del Mastro RG et al: A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am J Hum Genet, 2002; 70: 11-9