|
Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 76-81
|
A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ARTICLE;
CEPHALOMETRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EQUIPMENT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
TOOTH OCCLUSION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
CEPHALOMETRY;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II;
MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VERTICAL DIMENSION;
|
EID: 0036834926
PISSN: 05873908
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (24)
|
References (0)
|