The effects of testing in shifts on a clinical in-course computerized exam

Medical Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 202-204

  Kreiter, Clarence ^a   Peterson, M W ^a   Ferguson, K ^a   Elliott, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Computers; Education; Educational measurements; Medical *standards; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; STANDARD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SECURITY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037348102     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01435.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards 5.6 and 7.12. In: Standards for Educational and Psychological Measurement in Education. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association 1999; 73-84.
2. Ackerman TA, Evans J, Park KS, Tamassia C, Turner R. Computer assessments using visual stimuli: a test of dermatological skin disorders. In: Innovations in Computerized Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErIbaum Associates; 1999;44-56.
3. Bugbee AC Jr, The Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Based Testing. J Res Computing Education 1996;28 (3):282-99.
4. Hainbleton RK, HS. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing 1985.
5. Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot Studies of In-Course Assessment for a Revised Medical Curriculum: II. Computer-Based, Individual. Academic Med 1997;72 (12):1113-5.
6. Ogilvie RW, Trusk TC, Blue AV. Students'attitudes towards computer testing in a basic science course. Med Education 1999;33 (11): 828-31.