The relationship of race to women's use of health information resources

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 580-585

  Nicholson, Wanda K ^a   Grason, Holly A ^a   Powe, Neil R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Health information resources; Medical information; Race; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INCOME; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLICATION; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 0037325115     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.15     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. O'Malley MS, Earp, JL, Hawley ST, Schell MJ, Mathews HF, Mitcchell J. The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health 2001;91:49-54.
2. Cunningham WE, Davidson PL, Nakazono TT, Anderson RM. Do black and white adults use the same sources of information about AIDS prevention? Health Educ Behav 1999;26:703-13.
3. Guidry JJ, Aday LA, Zhang D, Winn RJ. Information sources and barriers to cancer treatment by racial\ethnic minority of patients. J Cancer Educ 1998;13:43-8.
4. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Aff (Milwood) 2000;19:255-65.
5. O'Malley AS, Kerner JF, Johnson L. Are we getting the message out to all? Am J Prev Med 1999;17:198-202.
6. Johnson JD, Meischke H. Cancer information: women's source and content preferences. J Health Care Mark 1991;11:37-44.
7. Johnson JD, Meischke H. Women's preferences for cancer-related information from specific types of mass media. Health Care Women Int 1994;15:23-30.
8. Faulk MM, Collins KS, editors. Women's health: the commonwealth survey. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.
9. Dearing JW, Rogers EM, Meyer G. Social marketing and diffusion-based strategies to communicating with unique populations: HIV prevention in San Francisco. J Health Commun Int Perspect 1996;4:342-64.
10. Kreps GL, Viswanath K. Communication interventions and cancer control: a review of the National Cancer Institute's Health Communication Intervention Research Initiative. Fam Commun Health 2001;24:ix-xiv.
11. Henderson J, Weisman CS. Women's health care experiences: survey development. In: Grason H, et al, editors. State strategies for improving data on women's health. Baltimore (MD): Women's and Childen's Health Policy Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
12. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley; 1989.
13. STATA software, version 6.0. College Station (TX): STATA Press; 1999.
14. Zion AB, Aiman J. Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:955-60.
15. Grisso JA, Freunin EW, Maurin E, Garcia-Espana B, Berlin JA. Racial differences in menopause information and the experience of hot flashes. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:98-103.
16. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web-based information on treatment of depression: cross-sectional survey. BMJ 2000;321:1511-5.
17. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001;285:2612-21.
18. Eysenbach G, Yihume G, Lampe K, et al. Quality management, certification and rating of health information on the MedCERTAIN. J Med Internet Res 2000;2(Suppl):e1-4.