Application of factorial design to microfiltration performance: Study of electrostatic and hydrodynamic effects

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 271-276

  Sousa, A C C ^a   Mateus, M ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Electrostatic effects; Factorial design; Hydrodynamic effects; Microfiltration

Indexed keywords

ELECTROLYTES; ELECTROSTATICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICROFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; POLYCARBONATES; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

FACTORIAL DESIGN;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

ELECTROLYTE; ELECTROSTATIC CHARGING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICROFILTRATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0037311974     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1205/026387603762878746     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bowen, W.R. and Sharif, A.O., 1996. The hydrodynamic and electrostatic interactions on the approach and entry of a charged spherical particle to a charged cylindrical pore in a charged planar surface with implications for membrane separation processes. Proc R Soc Lond A, 452: 2121-2140.
2. Bowen, W.R., Jones, M.G. and Yousef, H.N.S., 1998. Dynamic ultrafiltration of proteins-a neural approach, J Membr Sci, 146: 225-235.
3. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S., 1978, Statistics for Experimenters: an Introduction to Design. Data Analysis and Model Building (John Wiley, New York, USA).
4. Carvalho, C.M.L., Serralheiro, M.L.M., Cabral, J.M.S. and Aires-Barros, M.R., 1997, Application of factorial design to the study of transesterification reactions using cutinase in AOT-reversed micelles, Enzyme Microb Technol, 21: 117-123.
5. Carvalho, C.M.L., Cabral, J.M.S. and Aires-Barros, M.R., 1999, Cutinase stability in AOT reversed micelles: system optimization using the factorial design methodology, Enzyme Microb Technol, 24: 569-576.
6. Dornier, M., Decloux, M., Lebert, A. and Trystram, G., 1994, Use of experimental design to establish optimal crossflow filtration conditions: application to raw cane sugar clarification, J Food Process Engng, 17: 73-92.
7. Herrero, C., Prádanos, P., Calvo, J.I., Tejerina, F. and Hernández, A., 1997, Flux decline in protein microfiltration: influence of operative parameters, J Colloid Interface Sci, 187: 344-351.
8. Huisman, I.H. and Trägårdh, G., 1999, Determining the zeta potential of ultrafiltration membranes using their salt retention, Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem Engng Asp, 157: 261-268.
9. Huisman, I.H., Dutré, B., Persson, K.M. and Trägårdh, G., 1997, Water permeability in ultrafiltration and microfiltration: viscous and electroviscous effects, Desalination, 113: 95-103.
10. Huisman, I.H., Trägårdh, G., Trägårdh, C. and Pihlajamäki, A., 1998, Determining the zeta potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect, J Membr Sci, 104: 187-194.
11. Huisman, I.H., Prádanos, P. and Hernández, A., 2000, Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect and salt retention, J Membr Sci, 178: 55-64.
12. Le Bolay, N. and Ricard, A., 1995, Streaming potential in membrane processes: microfiltration of egg proteins, J Colloid Interface Sci, 170: 154-160.
13. Lojkine, M.H., Field, R.W. and Howell, J.A., 1992, Crossflow microfiltration of cell suspensions: a review of models with emphasis on particle size effects, Trans IChemE, Part A. Chem Eng Res Des, 70: 149-164.
14. Malaisamy, R., Annadurai, G. and Mohan, D., 2000, Performance optimization of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes for riboflavin separation using design experiments, Bioprocess Engng, 22: 227-232.
15. Mateus, M. and Cabral, J.M.S., 1995, Modeling membrane filtration of protein and cell suspensions in a vortex flow filtration system, AlChE J, 41: 764-772.
16. Mountzouris, K.C., Gilmour, S.G., Grandison, A.S. and Rastall, R.A., 1999, Modeling of oligodextran production in an ultrafiltration stirred-cell membrane reactor, Enzyme Microb Technol, 24: 75-85.
17. Oak, M.S., Kobayashi, T., Wang, H.Y., Fukaya, T. and Fujii, N., 1997, pH effect on molecular size exclusion of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane having carboxylic acid groups, J Membr Sci, 123: 185-195.
18. Ohmori, K. and Glatz, C.E., 1999, Effects of pH and ionic strength on microfiltration of C. glutamicum. J Membr Sci, 153: 23-32.
19. Otto, M., 1999, Chemometrics: Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany).
20. Pouliot, M., Pouliot, Y., Britten, M. and Ross, N., 1994, Effects of pH and ionic environment on the permeability and rejective properties of an alumina microfiltration membrane for whey proteins, J Membr Sci, 95: 125-134.
21. Sannier, F., LeCoeur, C., Zhao, Q., Garreau, I. and Piot, J.M., 1996, Separation of hemoglobin and myoglobin from yellowfin tuna red muscle by ultrafiltration: effect of pH and ionic strength, Biotechnol Bioengng, 52: 501-506.
22. Sivakumar, M., Annadurai, G. and Mohan, D., 1999. Studies on Box-Behnken design of experiments: cellulose acetate polyurethane ultrafiltration membranes for BSA separation. Bioprocess Engng, 21: 65-68.
23. Song, L., 1998, A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration, J Membr Sci, 144: 173-185.
24. Sousa, A.C.C., Cabral, J.M.S., Bowen, W.R. and Mateus, M., 2002, Micro-filtration of cutinase and Escherichia coli cell fragment suspensions. The role of the electrolyte environment on the development of dynamic cake layers, J Membr Sci, 207: 171-187.
25. Yates, F., 1937. Design and analysis of factorial experiments, Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Bulletin 35 (Macmillan, Harpenden, UK).