Feasibility study of NeoMend, a percutaneous arterial closure device that uses a nonthrombogenic bioadhesive

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 180, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 533-538

  Funovics, M A ^a   Wolf, F ^a   Philipp, M O ^a   Kee, S ^b   Tichy, B ^a   Dirisamer, A ^a   Rand, T ^a   Lammer, J ^a  

^a UNIV KLIN FÜR RADIODIAGNOSTIK   (Austria)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMATOMA; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; MOBILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCTURE; THROMBOGENESIS; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 0037307237     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800533     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wyman RM, Safian RD, Portway V, Skillman JJ, McKay RG, Baim DS. Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1400-1406
2. Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation 1993;88:1569-1578
3. Krause PB, Klein LW. Utility of a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device: to plug or not to plug? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1280-1282
4. Kahn KL. The efficacy of ambulatory cardiac catheterization in the hospital and free-standing setting. Am Heart J 1986;111:152-167
5. Kussmaul WG, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1685-1692
6. Clark DA, Moscovich MD, Vetrovec GW, Wexler L. Guidelines for the performance of outpatient catheterization and angiographic procedures. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;27:5-7
7. Kern MJ, Cohen M, Talley JD, et al. Early ambulation after 5 French diagnostic cardiac catheterization: results of a multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1475-1483
8. Silber S, Dörr R, Mühling H, König U. Sheath pulling immediately after PTCA: comparison of two different deployment techniques for the hemostatic puncture closure device - a prospective, randomized study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;41:378-383
9. Silber S, Björvik A, Mühling H, Rösch A. Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:421-427
10. Silber S, Gershony G, Schon B, Schon N, Jensen T, Schramm W. A novel vascular sealing device for closure of percutaneous arterial access sites. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1248-1252
11. Schräder R, Steinbacher S, Burger W, Kadel C, Vallbracht C, Kaltenbach M. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;27:298-302
12. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, Valentine MC, Nygaard TW. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:3-8
13. Hahn U, Betsch A, Wiskirchen J. et al. A new device for percutaneous suture-mediated closure of arterial puncture sites using exteriorized needles: initial experience. J Invasive Cardiol 2001;13:456-459
14. Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, Frankel R. Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002:55:8-13
15. Smith TP, Cruz CP, Moursi MM, Eidt JF. Infectious complications resulting from use of hemostatic puncture closure devices. Am J Surg 2001;182:658-662
16. Silber S. 10 years of arterial closure devices: a critical analysis of their use after PTCA [in German]. Z Kardiol 2000;89:383-389
17. van Loon J, Mars P. Biocompatibility: the latest developments. Med Device Technol 1997;8:20-24
18. Warren BS, Warren SG, Miller SD. Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;48:162-166
19. Semler HJ. Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology 1985;154:234-235
20. Gwechenberger M, Katzenschlager R, Heinz G, Gottsauner-Wolf M, Probst P. Use of a collagen plug versus manual compression for sealing arterial puncture site after cardiac catheterization. Angiology 1997;48:121-126
21. Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Erb M, et al. Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of antegrade femoral arterial access sites in patients who have received full anticoagulation therapy. Radiology 1999;210:47-52
22. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinksi EJ, Roubin GS. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 1999;11[suppl B]:6B-13B
23. Duffin DC, Muhlestein JB, Allisson SB, et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol 2001:13:354-362
24. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;8:638-641
25. Eidt JF, Habibipour S, Saucedo JF, et al. Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. Am J Surg 1999;178:511-516
26. Sesana M, Vaghetti M, Albiero R, et al. Effectiveness and complications of vascular access closure devices after interventional procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:395-399