Comparative analysis of the theory of inventive problem solving and the systematic approach of Pahl and Beitz

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 4, Issue , 1996, Pages

  Malmqvist, Johan ^a   Axelsson, Roger ^a   Johansson, Mikael ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; DESIGN PROCESS MODEL; DETAIL DESIGN; ENGINEERING SYSTEMS; THEORY OF INVENTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; WHOLE PROCESS;

ENGINEERING;

EID: 84907581919     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/96-DETC/DTM-1529     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Andreasen, M. M. Syntesemetoder på Systemgrundlag (Machine Design Methods Based on a Systematic Approach). PhD Thesis, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden, 1980. In Danish.
2. Andreasen, M. M. Designing on a "Designer's Workbench" (DWB). In Proceedings of the 9th WDK Workshop, Rigi, Switzerland, 1992.
3. Altov, H. (Altshuller, G. S.) The Art of Inventing (And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared). Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA, USA, 1994.
4. Altshuller, G. S. Creativity as an Exact Science. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1988.
5. Axelsson, R. and Johansson, M. En jämförelse mellan Pahl och Beitz systematiska konstruktionsmetodik och Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving (TIPS) (A Comparison Between the Design Methodology of Pahl and Beitz and the Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving). MSc Thesis, Machine and Vehicle Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 1995. In Swedish.
6. Bjärnemo, R. Formaliserade konstruktionsarbetssätt (Systematic Design Models). LicEng Thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1983. In Swedish.
7. Fey, V. R., Rivin, E. I. and Vertkin, I. M. (1994) Application of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving to Design and manufacturing Systems. Annals of the CIRP, 43(1):107-110.
8. Fey, V. R. and Rivin, E. R. (1996) Engineering Creativity Enhancement. Lecture notes from TRIZ Workshop, Göteborg, Sweden.
9. Finger, S. and Dixon, J. R. A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Research in Engineering Design, 1(1):51-67, 1989.
10. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Theory of Technical Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
11. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Engineering Design. Heurista, Zürich, 1992.
12. Invention Machine Corporation. Invention Machine version 2.1. Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995.
13. Kaulio, M. and Rosenblad, E. QFD vs "User-Oriented Product Development": A Comparative Analysis of Design Methods. Department of Consumer Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 1995.
14. Kuttig, D. Potential and Limits of Functional Modelling in the CAD Process. Research in Engineering Design, 5:40-48, 1993.
15. Malmqvist, J. Towards Computational Design Methods for Conceptual and Parametric Design. PhD Thesis, Machine and Vehicle Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 1993.
16. Malmqvist, J. A Computer-based Approach Towards Including Design History Information in Product Models and Function-Means Trees. In Proceedings of DTM-95, pp 593-602, Boston, 1995.
17. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. Engineering Design, 3rd edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.
18. Sushkov, V. V., Mars, N. J. I. and Wognum, P. M. Introduction to TIPS: A Theory for Creative Design. AI in Engineering, 1995.
19. Sushkov, V. V. Reuse of Physical Knowledge in Creative Engineering Design. In ECAI '94 Workshop on Models and Techniques for Reuse of Designs. Amsterdam, 1994.
20. Tsourikov, V. M. Inventive Machine: Second Generation. AI & Society, 7:62-77, 1993.
21. Ullman, D. G. The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
22. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger S. D. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.