Vascular responses in normal canine carotid arteries: Comparison between various self-expanding stents of the same unconstrained size

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 95-101

  Cha, Sang Hoon ^a,b   Han, Moon Hee ^c,d,f   Choi, Young Ho ^c   Yoon, Chang Jin ^c   Baik, Seung Kug ^e   Kim, Sung Jin ^a   Chang, Kee Hyun ^c,d  

^a Chungbuk National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Department of Diagnostic Radiology   (South Korea)

^f Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arterial response; Canine artery; Neointimal hyperplasia; Stent

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL REACTIVITY; CAROTID ARTERIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DOG; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FOLLOW UP; GUIDE WIRE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STENT; THICKNESS;

EID: 0037302092     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200302000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Connors JJ, Seidenwurm D, Wojak JC, et al. Treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the cervical carotid bifurcation: Current status and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:444-450.
2. Wholey MH, Wholey M, Mathias K, et al. Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovascr Intervent 2000;50:160-167.
3. Wholey MH, Wholey M, Bergeron P, et al. Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovascr Diagn 1998;44: 1-6.
4. Han RO, Schwartz RS, Kobayashi Y, et al. Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents for the reduction of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:253-259.
5. Taylor AJ, Gorman PD, Kenwood B, et al. A comparison of four stent designs on arterial injury, cellular proliferation, neointima formation, and arterial dimensions in an experimental porcine model. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:420-425.
6. Carter AJ, Scott D, Laird JR, et al. Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model. Cathet Cardivasc Diagn 1998;44:193-201.
7. Forthcoming.
8. Phatouros CC, Higashida RT, Malek AM, et al. Endovascular stenting for carotid artery stenosis: preliminary experience using the shape-memory-alloy-recoverable-technology (SMART) Stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:732-738.
9. Cwikiel W, Harnek J, Zoucas E, et al. Proliferative response in smooth muscle cells after angioplasty or insertion of self-expanding. Acta Radiol 1997;38:124-128.
10. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Pathobiologic responses to stenting. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:4-6.
11. Schwartz RS. Pathophysiology of restenosis: interaction of thrombosis, hyperplasia, and/or remodeling. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:14-17.
12. Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Tepe G, et al. Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. JVIR 2000;11:645-654.
13. Vorwerk D, Redha F, Neuerburg J, et al. Neointima formation following arterial placement of self-expanding stents of different radial force: experimental results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1994;17: 27-32.
14. Piamsomboon C, Roubin GS, Liu MW, et al. Relationship between oversizing of self-expanding stents and late loss index in carotid stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;45:139-143.
15. Kirsch EC, Khangure MS, Morling P, et al. Oversizing of self-expanding stents: influence on the development of neointimal hyperplasia of the carotid artery in a canine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:121-127.
16. Schurmann K, Vorwerk D, Kulisch A, et al. Experimental arterial stent placement comparison of a new nitinol stent and Wallstent. Invest Radiol 1995;30:412-420.
17. Schurmann K, Vorwerk D, Kulisch A, et al. Neointimal hyperplasia in low-profile nitinol stents, Palmaz stents, and Wallstents: a comparative experimental study. Cardiovasc Intervert Radiol 1996;19: 248-254.
18. Virmani R. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of arterial restenosis after PTCA and stenting. Intervent Neuroradiol 1999;5:35-39.
19. Lee KW, Park JH, Chung JW, et al. Short-term effects of a new intravascular nitinol stent in canine arteries. Invest Radiol 1999;34: 367-373.
20. Palmaz JC. Intravascular stents: tissue-stent interactions and design considerations. AJR 1993;160:613-618.
21. DePalma VA, Baier RE, Ford JW, et al. Investigation of three-surface properties of several metals and their relation to blood compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1972;6:37-75.
22. Sauvage LR, Berger KE, Wood SJ, et al. Interspecies healing of porous arterial prostheses. Arch Surg 1974;109:698-705.