Pocket Monte Carlo algorithm for classical doped dimer models

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 645031-645036

  Krauth, Werner ^a   Moessner, R ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE PHYSIQUE STATISTIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMER; MONOMER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DENSITY; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SCREENING;

EID: 0037301983     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. P.W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
2. D.S. Rokhsar and S.A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988).
3. R. Moessner, S.L. Sondhi, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 65, 024504 (2002).
4. This is in fact only true for each sector separately - see, e.g., Ref. 2.
5. P.W. Kasteleyn, Physica (Utrecht) 27, 1209 (1961).
6. For a review, see J. F. Nagle, C. S. O. Yokio, and S. M. Bhattacharjee, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1980), V. 13.
7. M.E. Fisher and J. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. 132, 1411 (1963).
8. R.E. Hartwig, J. Math. Phys. 7, 286 (1966).
9. P.W. Kasteleyn, J. Math. Phys. 4, 287 (1963).
10. O.J. Heilmann and E.H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. 24, 1412 (1970). These authors showed that the free energy of noninteracting monomer-dimer mixtures can be nonanalytical as a function of density and temperature only in the limit of vanishing density.
11. R. Moessner and S.L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001).
12. R.H. Fowler and G.S. Rushbrooke, Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1272 (1937).
13. J.F. Nagle, Phys. Rev. 152, 190 (1966).
14. D.S. Gaunt, Phys. Rev. 179, 174 (1969).
15. M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 124, 1664 (1961).
16. G.T. Barkema and M.E. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1155 (1998) and reference therein.
17. C. Dress and W. Krauth, J. Phys. A 28, L597 (1995).
18. A. Buhot and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3787 (1998); Phys. Rev. E 59, 2939 (1999).
19. A. Buhot and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3787 (1998); Phys. Rev. E 59, 2939 (1999).
20. L. Santen and W. Krauth, Nature (London) 405, 550 (2000).
21. The issue of ergodicity on the triangular lattice is discussed in C. Kenyon and E. Remila, Discrete Math. 152, 191 (1996) and in Ref. 11.
22. M.E. Fisher, J. Math. Phys. 7, 1776 (1966).
23. Although an asymptotic form is missing, the monomer correlation function has been obtained recursively for finite distances in parallel with this work by P. Fendley, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
24. By conformal invariance, this form is strictly applicable only for an infinite strip of width L for a system with critical correlations.
25. For these simulations, the initial seed of the pocket algorithm was chosen to be one of the monomers.
26. A monomer interaction of logarithmic nature at long distances appeared in the context of the quantum dimer model in L.B. Ioffe and A.I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B 40, 6941 (1989).
27. L. Samaj and B. Jancovici, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 301 (2002); 106, 323 (2002).
28. L. Samaj and B. Jancovici, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 301 (2002); 106, 323 (2002).
29. J. Kondev and C.L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4580 (1995).
30. R. Moessner, S.L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4457 (2000); R. Moessner and S.L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224401 (2001).
31. R. Moessner, S.L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4457 (2000); R. Moessner and S.L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224401 (2001).