Coronary angiography with 4 F catheters by the radial: Minimally invasive catheterization;Angiografía coronaria con catéteres de 4 F por la vía radial: El «cateterismo mínimamente invasio»

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 145-151

  Sanmartín Fernández, Marcelo ^a   Goicolea, Javier ^a   Meneses, Daniel ^a   Ruiz Salmerón, Rafael ^a   Mantilla, Ramón ^a   Claro, Ramón ^a   Bravo, Marisol ^a   Quintela, Sonsoles ^a   Calvo, Francisco ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DO MEIXOEIRO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Angiography; Cardiac catheterization; Catheters

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FEMORAL VEIN; FOLLOW UP; HEART CATHETER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIAL ARTERY; RATING SCALE; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

EID: 0037294425     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13043220     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, Vicari R, Frey MJ, Lakkis N, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1879-87.
2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, Van der Wicken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the Access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-75.
3. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Schneider J, Arrowood M, Newman W, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:572-6.
4. Cooper CJ, El-Schiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999;138:430-6.
5. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Allain A, Morice MC. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:181-7.
6. Molajo AO, Ward C, Bray CL, Dobson D. Comparison of the performance of superflow (5 F) and conventional 8 F catheter for cardiac catheterization by the femoral route. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987;13:275-6.
7. Hui WK, Klinke WP, Kubac G, Talibi T. Comparison of 5 F and 7/8 F catheters for left ventricular and coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;19:84-6.
8. Brown EF, Hrtnell GG, Morris K, Wilde P. Limitations in the use of five French coronary catheters. Int J Cardiol Imaging 1991;7: 43-5.
9. Talley JD, Smith SM, Walton-Shirley M, Hattel L, Szabo T, Godlewski K, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4.1 French catheters utilizing the percutaneous right brachial approach for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;26:55-60.
10. Metz D, Chapoutot L, Brasselet C, Jolly D. Randomized evaluation of four versus five French catheters for transfemoral coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 1999;22:29-32.
11. Khoukaz S, Kern MJ, Bitar SR, Azrak E, Eisenhauer M, Wolford T, et al. Coronary angiography using 4 F catheters with Acisted Power injection: a randomized comparison to 6 F, manual technique and early ambulation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:393-8.
12. Chahoud G, Khoukaz S, El-Shafei A, Azrak E, Bitar S, Kern MJ. Randomized comparison of coronary angiography using 4 F catheters: 4 F manual versus «Acisted» power injection technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:221-4.
13. Todd DM, Hubner PJ, Hudson N, Sarma J, McCance AJ, Caplin J. Multicentre, prospective, randomized trial of 4 vs 6 French catheters in 410 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;54:269-75.
14. Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T, Hozawa K, Yuki K, Hanashima K, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:180-6.
15. Robert N, Yaffe MJ, Langer A. Variations in measured vessel diameters using coronary measurement system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:131-6.
16. Sirnes PA, Myreng Y, Molstad P, Golf S. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis. Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories. Int J Card Imaging 1996;12:197-203.
17. Legrand V, Raskinet B, Martinez C, Kulbertus H. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6 F to 8 F catheters. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;37:39-45.
18. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. Radial approach. What about the learning curve? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;42:467-9