Effects of traditional lecture versus teacher-constructed & student-constructed self-teaching instructional resources on short-term science achievement & attitudes

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-99

  O'Connell McManus, Deborah ^a   Dunn, Rita ^b   Denig, Stephen J ^c  

^a Clarkstown Central High School   (United States)

^b ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Niagra University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037291238     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2003)065[0093:eotlvt]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bloom, B.S. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, Green, 22.
2. Braio, A., Dunn, R., Beasley, T.M., Quinn, P. & Buchanan, K. (1997). Incremental implementation of learning-style strategies among urban low achievers. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 15-25.
3. Curry, L. (1987). Integrating Concepts of Cognitive Learning Style: A Review with Attention to Psychometric Standards. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian College of Health Science Executives.
4. DeBello, T.C. (1990, July-September). Comparison of eleven major learning style models: variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation, and research behind them. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6 (3), 203-222.
5. Drew, M., Dunn, R., Quinn, P., Sinatra, R. & Spiridakis, J. (1994-1995). National Forum of Teacher Educational Journal, 8(2), 3-12.
6. Dunn, R., Bauer, E., Gemake, J., Gregory, J., Primavera, L. & Signer, B. (1994). Matching and mismatching junior high learning-disabled and emotionally handicapped students' perceptual preferences on math scores. National Forum of Teacher Educational Journal. 5(1), 3-13.
7. Dunn, R., Bruno, J., Sklar, R.I. & Beaudry, J.S. (1990). Effects of matching and mismatching minority developmental college students' hemispheric preferences on mathematics scores. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 283-288.
8. Dunn, R., Cavanaugh, D., Eberle, B. & Zenhausern, R. (1982). Hemispheric preference: the newest element of learning style. The American Biology Teacher, 44, 291-294.
9. Dunn, R. & DeBello, T.C. (Eds.). (1999). Improved Test Scores, Attitudes, and Behaviors in America's Schools: Supervisors' Success Stories. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
10. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Dunn, R., Dunn, K. & Price, G.E. (1974). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
12. Dunn, R., Griggs, S.A., Olson, J., Gorman, B. & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn learning-styles model. Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), 353-362.
13. Ferdenzi, A.C., Griggs, S.A. & Dunn, R. The key to improve academic achievement: Parents use modality-responsive home learning strategies. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 9(1), 50-56.
14. Hunt, D.E. (1979). Learning style and student needs: an introduction to conceptual level. In Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
15. Ingham, J. (1991). Matching instruction with employees perceptual preferences significantly increases training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2(1), 53-64.
16. Kerlinger, F.H. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd edition). Philadelphia: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Kirby, P. (1979). Cognitive Style, Learning Style, and Transfer Skill Acquisition. Columbus: National Center for Research in Vocational Education, The Ohio State University.
18. Lenehan, M.C., Dunn, R., Ingham, J., Murray, W. & Signer, B. (1994). Learning style: necessary know-how for academic success in college. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 461-465.