L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students' comprehension of English expository text

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-31

  Fung, Irene Y Y ^a   Wilkinson, Ian A G ^b   Moore, Dennis W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

English (second language); Metacognition; Reading comprehension; Reciprocal teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037290732     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00033-0     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of reading. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 1-22). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
2. Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers' prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 131-148.
3. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1980). Vocabulary knowledge and reading. Reading Education Report No. 11. Cambridge, MA.: Illinois University, Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading. ED177470.
4. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-thematic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
5. Anderson, V., & Roit, M. (1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in grades 6-10. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 121-137.
6. Baker, L. (1996). Social influences on metacognitive development in reading. In C. Cornoldi, & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 331-352). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
8. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
9. Benedetto, R. (1984). A psycholinguistic investigation of the top-level organization strategies in first and second language reading: Five case studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
10. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
11. Block, C. C. (1993). Strategy instruction in a literature-based program. Elementary School Journal, 94, 139-151.
12. Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1987). "Spontaneous" strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
14. Bossers, B. (1992). Reading in two languages: A study of reading comprehension in Dutch as a second language and in Turkish as a first language. Rotterdam: The Netherlands: Drukkerij Van Driel.
15. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
16. Brown, A. L., & & Palincsar, A. S. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. (Technical Report No. 334). U.S. Illinois: Center of the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, Urbana.
17. Bugel, K., & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 15-31.
18. Carrell, P. (1991). Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 12, 159-179.
19. Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-573.
20. Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short-circuit hypothesis of ESL reading-or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209.
21. Collier, V. P. (1988). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509-531.
22. Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 26-38.
23. Cotterall, S. (1990). Reciprocal teaching: A problem-solving approach to reading. Guidelines, 12, 2.
24. Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 175-187.
25. Dashwood, A., & Mangubhai, F., (1996), ESL students and strategy training in reading comprehension-decoding the implications for second language learning and teaching. Paper presented at the ACTA-ATESOL (NT) National Conference and 7th TESOL in Teacher Education Conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
26. Department of Education (1986). School Journal Catalogue 1965-1985. Wellington, NZ: Department of Education, School Publications Branch.
27. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94, 153-167.
28. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
29. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
30. Frederiksen, J. R. (1982). A componential theory of reading skills and their interactions. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Fung, I. Y. Y. (1999). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching for ESL students. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, N.Z.
32. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
33. Gelzheiser, L. M. (1986). Instruction that affords skill transfer. New York: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Children and Adults with Learning Disabilities.
34. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199-205.
35. Hague, S., & Olejnik, S. (1989). Text structure: Does awareness transfer from first language to second language? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
36. Hare, V. C., & Smith, D. C. (1982). Reading to remember: Studies of metacognitive reading skills in elementary school-aged children. Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 157-164.
37. Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the short circuit in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-31.
38. Jimenez, R. T., Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Lintina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 90-112.
39. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275-293.
42. Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Dearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handook of reading research (Vol 1, pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
43. Krishef, C. H. (1991). Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis. Malabar, Florida: Krieger.
44. Kucera, J., & Axelrod, S. (1995). Multiple-baseline designs. In S. B. Neuman, & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 47-63). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
45. Langer, J. A. (1990). Meaning construction in school literacy tasks: A study of bilingual students. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 427-471.
46. Le Fevre, D. (1996). Tape-assisted reciprocal teaching for readers with poor decoding skills. Unpublished Masters Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland.
47. Lee, J. F., & Musumeci, D. (1988). On hierarchies of reading skills and text types. Modern Language Journal, 72, 000-000.
48. Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistences. Child Development, 50, 643-655.
49. McCormick, S. (1995). What is single-subject experimental research? In S. B. Neuman, & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 1-31). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
50. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). , The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Miller, G. E. (1985). The effects of general and specific self-instruction training on children's comprehension monitoring performance during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 616-628.
52. Miller, G. E. (1987). The influence of self-instruction on the comprehension monitoring performance of average and above-average readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 303-317.
53. Miller, L. D., & Perkins, K. (1990). ESL reading comprehension instruction. RELC Journal, 21(1), 79-94.
54. Ministry of Education (1995). School Journal Catalogue (1980-1995). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education, Learning Media.
55. Moll, L. C. (1988). Some key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65, 465-472.
56. Moll, L. C., Estrada, E., Diaz, E., & Lopes, L. M. (1980). The organization of bilingual lessons: Implications for schooling. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 2(3), 53-58.
57. Neale, M. D. (1988). Neale analysis of reading ability revised. Australia: ACER.
58. Neuman, S. B., & McCormick, S. (1995). Single subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
59. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Reciprocal teaching. In A. S. Palincsar (Ed.), Teaching reading as thinking. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
61. Palincscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
62. Paris, S. G., Lipson, M., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
63. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: a program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239-1252.
65. Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
66. Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualisation of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 88(2), 151-165.
67. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. S., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
68. Raphael, T. E. (1984). Developmental aspects of training students to use information-locating strategies for responding to questions. Research Series No. 137. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. ED241592.
69. Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing student's awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217-235.
70. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
71. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Samuels, S. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 816-837). Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
73. Swaffar, J. K. (1988). Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive processes. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 123-148.
74. Taillefer, G. F. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insight into the short-circuit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 461-477.
75. Thibadeau, R., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1982). A model of the time course and content of reading. Cognitive Science, 6, 157-203.
76. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. New York: Wiley.