Molecular systematics and the control of invasive plants: A case study of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae)

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 109-118

  Gaskin, John F ^a,b  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b USDA ARS Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biological control; Conservation; Invasion; Molecular systematics; Phylogeny; Population structure; Saltcedar; Tamarisk; Tamarix

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; TAMARICACEAE; TAMARIX; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA;

EID: 0037283675     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3298530     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531-553.
2. Baum, B. 1967. Introduced and naturalized tamarisks in the United States and Canada. Baileya 15: 19-25.
3. _. 1978. The Genus Tamarix. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem.
4. Brotherson, J. D. & D. Field. 1987. Tamarix: Impacts of a successful weed. Rangelands 3: 110-112.
5. Crins, W. J. 1989. The Tamaricaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 70: 403-425.
6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Colombia Univ. Press, New York.
7. DeLoach, C. J. & J. L. Tracy. 1997. The Effects of Biological Control of Saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) on Endangered Species. Biological Assessment Draft. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.
8. _, R. I. Carruthers, J. E. Lovich, T. L. Dudley & S. D. Smith. 2000. Pp. 819-873 in N. Spencer (editor), Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman.
9. DiTomaso, J. M. 1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the Southwestern United States. Weed Technol. 12(2): 326-336.
10. Gaskin, J. F. & B. A. Schaal. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic investigation of U.S. invasive Tamarix. Syst. Bot. (in press).
11. Gillot, C. 1995. Entomology, 2nd ed. Plenum Press, New York.
12. Hamilton, M. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molec. Ecol. 8: 521-523.
13. Horton, J. S. 1964. Notes on the Introduction of Deciduous Tamarix. U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
14. Hughes, L. E. 1993. The Devil's Own - Tamarisk. Rangelands 15: 151-155.
15. Kartesz, J. T. & C. A. Mecham. 1999. Synthesis of the North American Flora, vers. 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill.
16. Kerpez, T. A. & N. S. Smith. 1987. Saltcedar Control for Wildlife Habitat Improvement in the Southwestern United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 169. Washington, D.C.
17. Kerr, A. 1987. The impact of molecular genetics on plant pathology. Annual Rev. Phytopathol. 25: 87-110.
18. Lledó, M., M. Crespo, K. Cameron, M. Fay & M. Chase. 1998. Systematics of Plumbaginaceae based upon cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23: 21-29.
19. McClintock, E. 1951. Studies in California ornamental plants. 3. The tamarisks. J. Calif. Hort. Soc. 12: 76-83.
20. Neill, W. M. 1985. Tamarisk. Fremontia 12(4): 22-23.
21. Rambaut, A. 1996. Se-Al Sequence Alignment Editor. Oxford, U.K.
22. Rank, N. E. 1991. Effects of plant chemical variation on a specialist herbivore: Willow leaf beetles in the eastern Sierra Nevada. In: C. A. Hall, V. Doyle-Johnes & B. Widawski (editors), Natural History of Eastern California and High-altitude Research 3: 161-181. University of California, White Mountain Research Station.
23. Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, Spread, and Aerial Extent of Saltcedar (Tamarix) in the Western States. U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 491-A (Studies in evapotranspiration), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
24. Rusanov, F. N. 1949. Sredniyeaziatskie Tamariksi. Tashkent. [Tamarisks of Central Asia.]
25. Schoonhoven, L., T. Jermy & J. van Loon. 1998. Insect-Plant Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
26. Soltis, D. E. & R. K. Kuzoff. 1995. Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Huechera group (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 49: 727-742.
27. Stein, B. A. & S. R. Flack. 1996. America's Least Wanted: Alien species invasions of U.S. ecosystems. The Nature Conservancy, Nov.-Dec.: 17-23.
28. Templeton, A. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
29. Thomas, M. B. & A. J. Willis. 1998. Biocontrol - Risky but necessary? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 325-329.
30. Whittemore, A. T. & B. A. Schaal. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 88: 2540-2544.
31. Wilken, D. H. 1993. Tamaricaceae. P. 1080 in J. C. Hickman (editor), The Jepson Manual. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
32. Wilson, E. O. 1997. Strangers in Paradise. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
33. TNC (The Nature Conservancy). 2002. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/worst.html.
34. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2002. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/npb/statenw.html.