메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-84

Evaluating UK research in speech and language therapy

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citations; Evaluation; Funding; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE COST; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; SOCIOLOGY; SPEECH THERAPY; TRAINING; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037280127     PISSN: 13682822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13682820304815     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (16)
  • 3
    • 0013224371 scopus 로고
    • Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications
    • DE BRUIN, R. E. and MOED, H. F., 1993, Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 26, 65-80.
    • (1993) Scientometrics , vol.26 , pp. 65-80
    • De Bruin, R.E.1    Moed, H.F.2
  • 4
    • 0034701485 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating 'payback' on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: Applied bibliometric study
    • GRANT, J., COTTRELL, R., CLUZEAU, F. and FAWCETT, G., 2000, Evaluating 'payback' on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study, BMJ, 320, 1107-1111.
    • (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 1107-1111
    • Grant, J.1    Cottrell, R.2    Cluzeau, F.3    Fawcett, G.4
  • 6
    • 0002260790 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs
    • LEWISON, G., 1996, The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs. Research Evaluation, 6, 25-36.
    • (1996) Research Evaluation , vol.6 , pp. 25-36
    • Lewison, G.1
  • 7
    • 0000776922 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields
    • LEWISON, G., 1999, The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields. Scientometrics, 46, 529-537.
    • (1999) Scientometrics , vol.46 , pp. 529-537
    • Lewison, G.1
  • 8
    • 0013268862 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland
    • LEWISON, G., 2001, The quantity and quality of female researchers: a bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52, 29-43.
    • (2001) Scientometrics , vol.52 , pp. 29-43
    • Lewison, G.1
  • 9
    • 0001363548 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Researchers' and users' perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals
    • LEWISON, G., 2002a, Researchers' and users' perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals. Scientometrics, 53, 229-240.
    • (2002) Scientometrics , vol.53 , pp. 229-240
    • Lewison, G.1
  • 10
    • 0013291420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From biomedical research to health improvement
    • LEWISON, G., 2002b, From biomedical research to health improvement, Scientometrics, 54, 179-192.
    • (2002) Scientometrics , vol.54 , pp. 179-192
    • Lewison, G.1
  • 11
    • 0002436949 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research
    • LEWISON, G. and DAWSON, G., 1998, The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41, 17-27.
    • (1998) Scientometrics , vol.41 , pp. 17-27
    • Lewison, G.1    Dawson, G.2
  • 12
    • 0000043671 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research
    • MARTIN, B., 1996, The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36, 343-362.
    • (1996) Scientometrics , vol.36 , pp. 343-362
    • Martin, B.1
  • 15
    • 0013286710 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • London: RCSLT
    • ROYAL COLLEGE OF SPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPISTS, 1998, Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines (London: RCSLT).
    • (1998) Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines
  • 16
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • SEGLEN, P. O., 1997, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314, 498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.