Validation of cognitive structures: A structural equation modeling approach

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-23

  Dimitrov, Dimiter M ^a   Raykov, Tenko ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037274293     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baker, F. B. (1993). Sensitivity of the linear logistic test model to misspecification of the weight matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(3), 201-210.
2. Boomsma, A. & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. H. C. duToit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Presence and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
3. Dimitrov, D. M. & Henning, J. (in press). A linear logistic test model of reading comprehension difficulty. In R. Hashway (Ed.), Annals of the Joint Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Educational Research and the National Academy for Educational Research 2000. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
4. Dimitrov, D. M. & Obiekwe, J. (1998, February). Validation of item difficulty components for algebra problems. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Tampa, FL.
5. Drum, P. A., Calfee, R. C., & Cook, L. K. (1981). The effects of surface structure variables on performance in reading comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 486-514.
6. Embretson, S. E. (1984). A general latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika, 49, 175-186.
7. Embretson, S. E. (1991 ). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495-516.
8. Embretson, S. E. (1995). A measurement model for linking individual learning to process and knowledge: application to mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 277-294.
9. Embretson, S. E. (2000). Multidimensional measurement from dynamic tests: Abstract reasoning under stress. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 505-543.
10. Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Embretson, S. & Wetzel, C. D. (1987). Component latent trait models for paragraph comprehension tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 175-193.
12. Fischer, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374.
13. Fischer, G. H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48, 3-26.
14. Fischer, G. (1995). The linear logistic model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.) Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 131-155). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Fischer, G. & Ponochny-Seliger, E. (1998). Structural Rasch modeling: Handbook of the usage of LPCM-WIN 1.0. Groningen, Netherlands: ProGAMMA.
16. Gitomer, D. H. & Rock, D. (1993). Addressing process variables in test analysis. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy, & I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 243-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Glas, C. A. W. & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fisher & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.). Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69-95). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
19. Hoogland, J. J. (1999). The robustness of estimation methods for covariance structure analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
20. Hoogland, J. J. & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 329-367.
21. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1996a). PRELIS2: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
22. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1996b). LISREL8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
23. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1996c). LISREL8: The SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
24. Mayer, R., Larkin, J., & Kadane, P. (1984). A cognitive analysis of mathematical problem solving. In R. Stenberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 231-273). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Medina-Diaz, M. (1993). Analysis of cognitive structure using the linear logistic test model and quadratic assignment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(2), 117-130.
26. Mislevy, R. J. (1993). Foundations of a new theory. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy, & I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 19-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Perkins, K., Gupta, L., & Tammana, R. (1995). Predicting item difficulty in a reading comprehension test with an artificial neural network. In A. Davies & J. Upshur (Eds.) Language testing, Vol. 12, No. 1 (pp. 34-53). London: Edward Arnold.
28. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.
29. Riley, M. S. & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 49-101.
30. Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E., & Bush, M. J. (1998). Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 66-78.
31. Snow, R. E. & Lohman, D. F. (1984). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263-331). New York: Macmillan.
32. Spada, H. (1977). Logistic models of learning and thought. In H. Spada & W. F. Kempf (Eds.), Structural models of thinking and learning (pp. 227-262).
33. Spada, H. & Kluwe, R. (1980). Two models of intellectual development and their reference to the theory of Piage. In R. Kluwe & H. Spada (Eds.), Developmental model of thinking (pp. 1-32). New York: Academic Press.
34. Spada, H. & McGaw, B. (1985). The assessment of learning effects with linear logistic test models. In S. Embretson (Ed.), Test design: New directions in psychology and psychometrics (pp. 169-193). New York: Academic Press.
35. Van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1982). Two new statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 47, 123-139.
36. Whitely, S. E. & Schneider, L. (1981). Information structure for geometric analogies: A test theory approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 38 3-397.
37. Wright, B. D. & Stone, M. H. (1979), Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.