Multidimensional measurement from dynamic tests: Abstract reasoning under stress

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 505-542

  Embretson, Susan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034346285     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3504_05     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, R. A., Wilson, M. & Wang, W-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement.
2. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change, 10, 203-212.
3. Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A. & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of processing in the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
4. Cronbach, L. & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure change -or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
5. Dearborne, D. F. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123-147, 195-216.
6. DiBello, L. V., Stout, W. F. & Roussos, L. (1995). Unified cognitive psychometric assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In P.D. Nichols, S.F. Chipman, R. L. Brennan (Eds.) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
7. Embretson, S. E. (1987a). Improving the measurement of spatial aptitude by a dynamic testing procedure. Intelligence, 11, 333-358.
8. Embretson, S. E. (1987b). The psychometrics of dynamic testing. In C. Lidz, (Ed.), Dynamic testing. Beverly Hills, CA: Guilford Press.
9. Embretson, S. E. (1991a). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495-516.
10. Embretson, S. E. (1991b). Implications of a multidimensional latent trait model for measuring change. In Collins, L. & Horn, J. (Ed.). Best methods for analyzing change, (pp. 184-197). American Psychological Association Books.
11. Embretson, S. E. (1991c). Who changes the most? Some non-ignorable scaling artifacts in measuring individual differences. The Score, XVI, pp. 4-6.
12. Embretson, S. (1992). Measuring and validating cognitive modifiability: An ability in the spatial domain. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 25-50.
13. Embretson, S. E. (1994a). Applications of cognitive design systems to test development. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), Advances in cognitive assessment: An interdisciplinary perspective. New York: Plenum Publishing Company, 107-135.
14. Embretson, S. E. (1994b). Comparing changes between groups: Some perplexities arising from psychometrics. In D. Laveault, B. D. Zumbo, M.E. Gessaroli, and M. W. Boss (Eds.), Modern theories of measurement: Problems and issues. Ottawa: Edumetric Research Group, University of Ottawa.
15. Embretson, S. (1995a). A measurement model for linking individual change to processes and knowledge: Application to mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Measurement.
16. Embretson, S. E. (1995b). Working memory capacity versus general central processes in intelligence. Intelligence, 20, 169-189.
17. Embretson, S. E. (1996). Item response theory models and inferential bias in multiple group comparisons. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 201-212.
18. Embretson, S. E. (1997a). The factorial validity of a cognitively designed test: The Spatial Learning Ability Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57, 99-107.
19. Embretson, S. E. (1997b). Structured ability models in tests designed from cognitive theory. In M. Wilson, G. Engelhard & K. Draney (Eds.) Objective Measurement III. Norwood NJ: Ablex, pp. 223-236.
20. Embretson, S. E. (1998a). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 300-396.
21. Embretson, S.E. (1998b, August). Modiflability in lifespan development: Multidimensional Rasch Model for learning and change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
22. Embretson, S. E. & Prenovost, L. K. (in press). Dynamic cognitive testing: What is gained? Educational and Psychological Measurement.
23. Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
24. Grigorenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75-111.
25. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Guthke, J. (1993). Developments in learning potential assessment. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars Learning potential assessement: Theoretical, methodological and practice issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
27. Guthke, J., Beckmann, J. F. & Dobat, H. (1997). Dynamic testing-problems, uses, trends and evidence of validity. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 17-32.
28. Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K. & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
29. Humphreys, M. S. & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153-184.
30. Kanfer, R. & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction aproach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
31. Lidz, C. (1987). Dynamic testing. Beverly Hills, CA: Guilford Press.
32. Lidz, C. S. (1996). Dynamic assessment approaches. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford Press.
33. Mislevy, R. (1993). Foundations of a new test theory. In N. Frederiksen, R. Mislevy & I. Bejar, Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.
35. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929-938.
36. Sheehan, K. M. (1997). A tree-based approach to proficiency scaling and diagnostic assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 333-354.
37. Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Tupes, E. C. & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Tech. Rep. 61-97.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.