Looking for an unambiguous geometrical definition of organic series from 3-D molecular similarity indices

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 248-254

  Cotta Ramusino, Marina ^a   Benigni, Romualdo ^a   Passerini, Laura ^a   Giuliani, Alessandro ^a  

^a ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC MOLECULES; MOLECULAR SIMILARITY INDICES;

ELECTROSTATICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

MOLECULES;

EID: 0037269401     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci020375z     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Oprea, T. I.; Gottfries, J. Chemography: the art of navigating in chemical space. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 157-166.
2. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Exploring QSAR. 1. Fundamentals and applications in chemistry and biology; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995.
3. Kulkarni, A.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Osborne, R.; Bruner, L. H.; Thompson, E. D. Prediction of eye irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis. Toxicol. Sci. 2001, 59, 335-345.
4. ASP, Automated Similarity Package, previously Oxford Molecular Ltd., now Accelrys (www.accelrys.com).
5. Fradera, X.; Amat, L.; Besalu, E.; Carbo-Dorca, R. Application of molecular quantum similarity to QSAR. Quant. Struct. -Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 25-32.
6. Carbo-Dorca, A. L.; Ponec, R. Simple linear QSAR models based on quantum similarity measures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5169-5180.
7. Bowen-Jenkins, P. E.; Richards, W. G. Quantitative measures of similarity between pharmacologically active compounds. Intl. J. Quantum Chem. 1986, XXX, 763-768.
8. Good, A. C.; Peterson, S. J.; Richards, W. G. QSAR's from similarity matrices. Techniques validation and application in the comparison of different similarity evaluation methods. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2929-2937.
9. Robert, D.; Carbo-Dorca R. A formal comparison between molecular quantum similarity measures and indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 469-475.
10. SYBYL 6.6 Tripos Associate Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, Suite 303, St. Louis, Missouri, 63144-2913.
11. Clark, M.; Cramer III, R. D.; Van Opdenbosch, N. Validation of the general purpose Tripos 5.2 Force Field. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 982-1012.
12. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - A rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1979, 36, 3219-3288.
13. Darroch, J.; Mosimann, J. E.; Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 1985, 72, 241-252.
14. Duca, J. S.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Estimation of molecular similarity based on 4D-QSAR analysis: formalism and validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1367-1387.
15. Benigni, R.; Cotta-Ramusino, M.; Giorgi, F.; Gallo, G. Molecular similarity matrixes and quantitative structure-activity relationships: a case study with methodological implications. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 629-635.
16. Benigni, R.; Cotta-Ramusino, M.; Gallo, G.; Giorgi, F.; Giuliani, A.; Vari', M. R. Deriving a quantitative chirality measure from molecular similarity matrices. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3699-3703.