The US power cycle, expected utility, and the probable future of the FTAA

International Political Science Review

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  James, Patrick ^a   Lusztig, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

FTAA; Power cycle; Trade policy; US foreign policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037268994     PISSN: 01925121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192512103024001005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bernal, R.L. (1996). "Regional Trade Agreements and the Establishment of a Free Trade Agreement of the America". Law and Policy in International Business, 27(4): 945-962.
2. Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Election. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brecher, M. (1999). "International Studies in the Twentieth Century and Beyond." International Studies Quarterly. 43(2): 213-264.
4. Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1994). "Political Forecasting: An Expected Utility Model." In European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications, and Comparisons (B. Bueno de Mesquita et al., eds), 71-104. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Bunge, M. (1996). Finding Philosophy in Social Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
6. Doran, C.F. (1971). The Politics of Assimilation: Hegemony and Its Aftermath. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Doran, C.F. (1991). Systems in Crisis: New Imperatives of High Politics at Century's End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doran, C.F. (2000). "Economics. Philosophy of History, and the "Single Dynamic" of Power Cycle Theory (Market Share): Implications for Asian Power Cycles." Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress, International Political Science Association. Quebec City, August.
9. Hebron, L. (1995). Economic Power Cycles and Cooperation among Nation-States. PhD diss., Florida State University.
10. Hebron, L. and P. James (1997). "Great Powers, Cycles of Relative Capability and Crises in World Politics." International Interactions, 23(2): 145-173.
11. International Interactions (1997). Special issue on Expected Utility Forecasting, 23(3-4), 1997.
12. Kcohane, R.O. (1980). "The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967-1997." In Change in the International System (O.R. Holsti et al., eds), 131-162. Boulder, CO: Westview.
13. Lusztig, M. (1998). "The Limits of Rent-Seeking: Why Protectionists Become Free Traders." Review of International Political Economy, 5(1): 38-63.
14. Mace, G. and L. Belanger, eds (1999). The Americas in Transition: The Contours of Regionalism. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
15. Mayer, F.W. (2000). "Labor, Environment and the State of US Trade Politics." NAFTA: Law and Business Review of the Americas, 6(3): 325-346.
16. Nye, J. (1990). Bound to Lead. New York: Basic Books.
17. Pastor, R. (1996). "The Clinton Administration and the Americas: The Postwar Rhythm and Blues." Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 38(4): 99-129.
18. Pine, A. and J. Hook (1997). "Clinton Pulls Trade Bill Rather than Risk Defeat." Los Angeles Times. November 10.
19. Putnam, R. (1988). "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games." International Organization, 42(3): 427-460.
20. Starr, P.K. and A. Hristoulas (2000). "Still Number 1: Economic Flows and US Leadership in the Post-Cold War Era." Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico. Mexico City, Mexico.
21. Uslaner, E.M. (2000). "The Democratic Parry and Free Trade: An Old Romance Restored." In the special issue NAFTA: Law and Business Review of the American, 6(3): 347-362.
22. Wiarda, H.J. (1995). "After Miami: The Summit, the Peso Crisis, and the Future of US-Latin American Relations." Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 37(1): 43-68.