Blood pressure measurement in an ambulatory setting: Concordance between physician and patient self-measurement

Journal of Human Hypertension

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-50

  Vinyoles, E ^a   Blancafort, X ^a   Lopez Quinones C ^a   Arque M ^a   Brau, A ^a   Cerdan N ^a   De La Figuera, M ^a   Diaz F ^a   Pujol, E ^a  

^a La Mina Primary Health Care Centre   (Spain)

Author keywords

BP physician measurement; BP self measurement; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEVICE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PREVALENCE; SELF EXAMINATION; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING STUDIES; SELF-EXAMINATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS;

EID: 0037258507     PISSN: 09509240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001505     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. WHO. International Society of Hypertension. Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. WHO, Geneva 1999.
2. Beevers G, Lip GYH, O'Brien E. Blood pressure measurement. Sphygmomanometry: Factors common to all techniques. BMJ 2001; 322: 981-985.
3. Beevers G, Lip GYH, O'Brien E. Conventional sphygmomanometry: Technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001; 322: 1043-1047.
4. McKay DW et al. Clinical assessment of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 1990; 4: 639-645.
5. McAlister FA, Straus SE. Measurement of blood pressure: An evidence based review. BMJ 2001; 322: 908-911.
6. Rasmussen SL, Trop-Pedersen C, Borch-Johnsen K, Ibsen H. Normal values for ambulatory blood pressure and differences between casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure: Results from a Danish population survey. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1415-1424.
7. Mancia G et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normality: Results from the PAMELA study. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1377-1390.
8. Ohkubo T et al. Reference values for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on a prognostic criterion: Ohasama study. Hypertension 1998; 32: 255-259.
9. Staessen JA, Thijs L. Development of diagnostic thresholds for automated self-measurement of blood pressure in adults. First International Consensus Conference on Blood Pressure Self-Measurement. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5: 101-109.
10. Weisser B et al. Normal values of blood pressure self-measurement in view of the 1999 World Health Organization - International Society of Hypertension Guidelines. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13: 940-943.
11. Garcia-Vera MP, Labrador FJ, Sanz J. Comparison of clinic, home self-measured, and work self-measured blood pressures. Behav Med 1999; 25: 13-22.
12. La Batide-Alanore A et al. Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: Implications for subsequent management. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 391-398.
13. O'Neill H, O'Brien E, Stanton A, Heddictch K. The suitability of an automated blood pressure measuring device - The Omron HEM-705CP - In a large multicentre study: The ASCOT study. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15(Suppl 1): S83-S85.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
15. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphingmomanometers. AAMI: Arlington, 1987.
16. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413-2446.
17. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12(4 Suppl); 142-158.
18. Mengden T et al. User procedure for self-measurement of blood pressure. First International Consensus Conference on Self Blood Pressure Measurement. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5: 111-129.
19. Myers MG, Meglis G, Polemidiotis G. The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11: 491-493.
20. Council Directive of 22 December 1979 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement and on the repeal of Directive 71/354/ECC. Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 39. 15.2; 1980, p 42.
21. O'Brien E. Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. BMJ 2000; 320: 815-816.
22. Hozawa A et al. Prognosis of isolated systolic and isolated diastolic hypertension as assessed by self-measurement of blood pressure at home: The Ohasama study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3301-3306.
23. Ohkubo T et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: A population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 971-975.
24. Tsuji I et al. Proposal of reference values for home blood pressure measurement. Prognostic criteria based on a prospective observation of the general population in Ohasama, Japan. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 409-418.