The human proteome organization (HUPO) and environmental health

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 111, Issue 1 T, 2003, Pages 1-5

  Merrick, B Alex ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Environmental health; Human; Proteome; Proteomics; Toxicogenomics; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AGENT; PROTEOME;

BIOINFORMATICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL DISEASE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; HUMAN PROTEOME ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0037254940     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/txg.5918     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Adam BL, Qu Y, Davis JW, Ward MD, Clements MA, Cazares LH, et al. 2002. Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. Cancer Res 62:3609-3614.
2. Borrebaeck CA, Ekstrom S, Hager AC, Nilsson J, Laurell T, Marko-Varga G. 2001. Protein chips based on recombinant antibody fragments: a highly sensitive approach as detected by mass spectrometry. Biotechniques 30:1126-1130, 1132.
3. Bruno ME, Borchers CH, Dial MJ, Walker N, Hartis JE, Wetmore BA, et al. 2002. Effects of TCDD upon lkB and lKK subunits localized in microsomes by proteomics, Arch Biochem Biophys 406:153-164.
4. Farmer PB, 1999. Studies using specific biomarkers for human exposure assessment to exogenous and endogenous chemical agents. Mutat Res 428:69-81.
5. Fessler MB, Malcolm KC, Duncan MW, Worthen GS. 2002. A genomic and proteomic analysis of activation of the human neurophil by lipopolysaccharide and its mediation by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 277:31291-302.
6. Fung ET, Thulasiraman V, Weinberger SR, Dalmasso EA. 2001. Protein biochips for differential profiling. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:65-69.
7. Gagnon E, Duclos S, Rondeau C, Chevet E, Cameron PH, Steele-Mortimer O, et al. 2002. Endoplasmic reticulum-mediated phagocytosis is a mechanism of entry into macrophages. Cell 110:119-131.
8. Greenbaum D, Jansen R, Gerstein M. 2002. Analysis of mRNA expression and protein abundance data: an aprroach for the cellular population of proteins and transcripts. Bioinformatics 18:585-596.
9. Griffin TJ, Gygi SSP, Ideker T, Rist B, Eng J, Hood L, et al. 2002. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:323-333.
10. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. 1999a. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17:994-999.
11. Gygi SP, Rochon Y, Franza BR, Aebersold R. 1999b. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 19:1720-1730.
12. Haab BB. 2001. Advances in protein microarray technology for protein expression and interaction profiling. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 4:116-23.
13. Hanash SM. 2001. Global profiling of gene expression in cancer using genomics and proteomics. Curr Opin Mol Ther 3:538-545.
14. Hecker M, Engelmann S. 2000. Proteomics, DNA arrays and the analysis of still unknown regulons and unknown proteins of Bacillus subtilis and pathogenic gram-positive bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol 290:123-134.
15. Hille JM, Freed AL, Watzig H. 2001. Possibilities to improve automation, speed and precision of proteome analysis: a comparison of two-dimensional electrophoresis and alternatives. Electrophoresis 22:4035-4052.
16. Honore B. 2001. Genome- and proteome-based technologies: status and apllications in the postgenomic era. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 1:265-274.
17. HUPO (Human Proteome Organization). 2002. Available: http://www.hupo.org/ [Accessed 2 December 2002]
18. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng JK, et al. 2001. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292:929-934.
19. Issaq HJ, Veenstra TD, Conrads TP, Felschow D. 2002. The SELDI-TOF MS approach to proteomic: protein profiling and biomarker identification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292:587-592.
20. Ju C, Uetrecht JP. 2002. Mechanism of idiosyncratic drug reactions: reactive metabolite formation, protein binding and the regulation of the immune system. Curr Drug Metab 3:367-377.
21. Jung E, Heller M, Sanchez JC, Hochstrasser DF. 2000. Proteomics meets cell biology: the establishment of subcellular proteomes. Electrophoresis 21:3369-3377.
22. Kennedy S. 2001. Proteomic profiling from human samples: the body fluid alternative. Toxicol Lett 120:379-384.
23. Kodadek T. 2002. Development of protein-detecting microarrays and related devices. Trends Biochem Sci 27:295-300.
24. Li J, Zhang Z, Rosenzweig J, Wang YY, Chan DW. 2002. Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomakers to detect breast cancer. Clin Chem 48:1296-1304.
25. Liebler DC. 2002. Proteomic approaches to characterize protein modifications: new tools to study the effects of environmental exposures. Environ Health perspect 110(suppl 1):3-9.
26. Maher BA. 2002. Towards a global proteome. Scientist 16:29-22.
27. Moody MD, Van Arsdell SW, Murphy KP, Orencole SF, Burns C. 2001. Array-based ELISAs for high-throughput analysis of human cytokines. Biotechniques 31:186-190, 192-194.
28. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM, et al. 2002. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 359:572-577.
29. Tini M, Jewell UR, Camenisch G, Chilov D, Gassmann M. 2002 Generation and application of chicken egg-yolk antibodies. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 131:569-574.
30. Walter G, Bussow K, Lueking A, Glokler J. 2002. High-throughput protein arrays: prospects for molecular diagnostics. Trends Mol Med 8:250-253.
31. Weinberger SR, Viner RI, Ho P. 2002. Tagless extraction-retentate chromatography: a new global protein digestion strategy for monitoring differential protein expression. Electrophoresis 23:3182-3192.