Mapping symbols to response modalities: Interference effects on Stroop-like tasks

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 427-437

  Baldo, Juliana V ^a   Shimamura, Arthur P ^a   Prinzmetal, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VISION;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032042531     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206864     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BELLER, H. (1975). Naming, reading, and executing directions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 104, 154-160.
2. CLARK, H., & BROWNELL, H. (1975). Judging up and down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 339-352.
3. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
4. DYER, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition, 1, 106-120.
5. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
6. FITTS, P., & SEEGER, C. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
7. FLOWERS, J. H., WARNER, J. L., & POLANSKY, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in "ignoring" irrelevant information. Memory & Cognition, 7, 86-94.
8. FOX, E. (1992). Stimulus-response compatibility as a determinant of interference in a Stroop-like task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 377-380.
9. GREENWALD, A. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52-57.
10. KEELE, S. (1972), Attention demands of memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 245-248.
11. KLEIN, G. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
12. KLOPFER, D. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150-157.
13. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
14. Lu, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
15. MACLEOD, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
16. MACLEOD, C., & DUNBAR, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126-135.
17. MASCOLO, M., & HIRTLE, S. (1990). Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 195-215.
18. MCCLAIN, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 266-270.
19. O'LEARY, M., & BARBER, P. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 830-844.
20. PALEF, S. R. (1978). Judging pictorial and linguistic aspects of space. Memory & Cognition, 6, 70-75.
21. PALEF, S. R., & OLSON, D. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 201-209.
22. SCHNEIDER, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
23. SHAFFER, W., & LABERGE, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 413-426.
24. SHIMAMURA, A. (1987). Word comprehension and naming: An analysis of English and Japanese orthographies. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 15-40.
25. SHOR, R. (1970). The processing of conceptual information on spatial directions from pictorial and linguistic symbols. Acta Psvchologica, 32, 346-365.
26. SHOR, R. (1971). Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concept domains. Journal of General Psychology, 85, 187-205.
27. SIMON, R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. Proctor & T. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. SMITH, M., & MAGEE, L. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
29. STROOP, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
30. TREISMAN, A., & FEARNLEY, S. (1969). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words. Nature, 222, 437-439.
31. TZELGOV, J., HENIK, A., & LEISER, D. (1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 760-771.
32. VIRZI, R. A., & EGETH, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.
33. WANG, H., & PROCTOR, R. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1201-1217.