Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: The attorney-juvenile client relationship

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 175-198

  Schmidt, Melinda G ^a   Reppucci, N Dickon ^b   Woolard, Jennifer L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; JUVENILE; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUDGMENT; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LAWYERS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRISONERS; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037248642     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.532     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Alexander, C., Kim, Y., Ensminger, M., Johnson, K., Smith, B., & Dolan, L. (1990). A measure of risk taking for young adolescents: Reliability and validity assessments. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 559-569.
2. American Bar Association. (1989). ABA criminal justice mental health standards. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Arnett,J. (1994). Sensation-seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 289-296.
4. Barnum, R. (2000). Clinical and forensic evaluation of competence to stand trial in juvenile defendants. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 193-223). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Benthin, A., Slovic, P., & Severson, H. (1993). A psychometric study of adolescent risk perception. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 153-168.
6. Bilchik, S. (1999). Minorities in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Offenders and Victim's: 1999 National Report, OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7. Bonnie, R. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291-316.
8. Bonnie, R. J., & Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 73-103). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Buss, E. (2000). The role of lawyers in promoting juveniles' competence as defendants. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 243-265). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). Researching adolescents' judgment and culpability. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 325-343). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Cauffman, E., Woolard, J. L., & Reppucci, N. D. (1999). Justice for juveniles: New perspectives on adolescents' competence and culpability. Quinnipiac Law Review, 18, 403-419.
12. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.
13. Cooper, D. K. (1997). Juveniles' understanding of trial-related information: Are they competent defendants? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 167-180.
14. Cowden, V. L., & McKee, G. R. (1995). Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: Cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship. Journal of Family Law, 33, 629-660.
15. Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (Eds.). 1996. Stress and human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).
17. Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
18. Federle, K. (1988). Overcoming the adult-child dyad: A methodology for interviewing and counseling the juvenile client in delinquency cases. Journal of Family Law, 26, 545-578.
19. Federle, K. (1996). The ethics of empowerment: Rethinking the role of lawyers in interviewing and counseling the child client. Fordham Law Review, 64, 1655-1697.
20. Ferguson, A., & Douglas, A. (1970). A study of juvenile waiver. San Diego Law Review, 7, 39-54.
21. Finn, P., & Bragg, B. (1986). Perception of the risk of an accident by young and older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 289-298.
22. Flavell, J. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
24. Furby, L., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1990). Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
25. Gardner, W., & Herman, J. (1990). Adolescents' AIDS risk taking: A rational choice perspective. In W. Gardner, S. Millstein, & B. Wilcox (Eds.), Adolescents in the AIDS epidemic (pp. 17-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Greene, A. L. (1986). Future time perspective in adolescence: The presence of things future revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 99-113.
27. Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles' capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134-1166.
28. Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.
29. Grisso, T. (1993, November). Developing challenges to a retributive legal response to adolescent homicide. Paper presented at the Browning Hoffman Invited Lecture at the University of Virginia Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, Charlottesville, VA.
30. Grisso, T. (1997). The competence of adolescents as trial defendants. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 3-32.
31. Grisso, T. (1999). Dealing with juveniles' competence to stand trial: What we need to know. Quinnipiac Law Review, 18, 371-383.
32. Grisso, T. (2000). What we know about youths' capacities as trial defendants. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 139-171). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Grisso, T., & Pomiciter, C. (1977). Interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of procedures, safeguards, and rights waiver. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 321-342.
34. Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. (Eds.). (2000). Youth on trial. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Grisso, T., & Vierling, L. (1978). Minors' consent to treatment: A developmental perspective. Professional Psychology, 9, 412-427.
36. Hackler, J. (1992). The manifest and latent functions of legal aid. International Criminal Justice Review, 2, 58-75.
37. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
38. Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
39. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
40. Lavery, B., Siegel, A. W., Cousins, J. H., & Rubovits, D. S. (1992). Adolescent risk-taking: An analysis of problem behaviors in problem children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 277-294.
41. Lopes, L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255-275.
42. Margulies, P. (1996). The lawyer as caregiver: Child client's competence in context. Fordham Law Review, 64, 1473-1504.
43. Model Rules of Professional Conduct. (1983).
44. Naugle, R. I., Chelune, G. J., & Tucker, G. D. (1993). Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Psychological Assessment, 5, 182-186.
45. Parker, L. D. (1993). The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test: An introduction and review. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 152-156.
46. Peterson-Badali, M., & Abramovitch, R. (1992). Children's knowledge of the legal system: Are they competent to instruct legal counsel? Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 139-160.
47. Peterson-Badali, M., Abramovitch, R., Koegl, C. J., & Ruck, M. D. (1999). Young people's experience of the Canadian youth justice system: Interacting with police and legal counsel. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 455-465.
48. Poythress, N., Nicholson, R., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., et al. (1999). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool - Criminal Adjudication, professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
49. Reppucci, N. D. (1999). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 307-326.
50. Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1999). Competence and judgment in serious juvenile offenders: Report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Part I, Developmental implications for adolescent offenders. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Department of Psychology.
51. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
52. Schmidt, M. G., & Reppucci, N. D. (2002). Children's rights and capacities. In B. L. Bottoms, M. B. Kovera, & B. D. McAuliff (Eds.), Children and the law: Social science and policy (pp. 76-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Scott, E. S. (2000). Criminal responsibility in adolescence: Lessons from developmental psychology. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 291-324). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54. Scott, E. S., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 221-244.
55. Seigler, R. (1991). Children's thinking (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1995). Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
57. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
58. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249-272.
59. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1999). The elephant in the courtroom: A developmental perspective on the adjudication of youthful offenders. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 6, 389-417.
60. Tobey, A., Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. (2000). Youths' trial participation as seen by youths and their attorneys: An exploration of competence-based issues. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 225-242). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Ventrell, M. R. (1995). Rights & duties: An overview of the attorney-child client relationship. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 26, 259-284.
62. Weithorn, L. (1983). Involving children in decisions affecting their own welfare. In G. Melton, G. Koocher, & M. Saks (Eds.), Children's competence to consent (pp. 235-260). New York: Plenum.
63. Woolard, J. L. (2002). Capacity, competence, and the juvenile defendant: Implications for research and policy. In B. L. Bottoms, M. B. Kovera, & B. D. McAuliff (Eds.), Children and the law: Social science and policy (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Woolard, J. L., Fried, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (2001). Toward an expanded definition of adolescent competence in legal situations. In R. Roesch, R. R. Corrado, & R. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge (pp. 21-39). London: Routledge.
65. Woolard, J. L., & Reppucci, N. D. (2000). Researching juveniles' capacities as defendants. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 173-191). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.