Developments in electronic publishing in the biomedical sciences

Program

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 6-15

  Lambert, Jill ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Archives; Biomedical; Electronic publishing; Journal publishing; Online retrieval

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037245128     PISSN: 00330337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00330330310460545     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Bachrach, S. (2001), “SPARC: The view from the faculty”, Serials, Vol. 14 No 2, p. 137.
2. Bachrach, S. et al. (1998), “Who should own scientific papers?”, Science Magazine, Vol. 281 No. 5382, pp. 1459-60, available at: www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1459
3. Bailey, C. (2001), “SPARC – the CURL perspective”, Serials, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 135-7.
4. Butler, D. (2000), “All parties keen to press on with the Europe-based science Web site”, Nature, Vol. 403 No. 6768, pp. 347-8.
5. Day, M. (1999), “The scholarly journal in transition and the Pub Med Central proposal”, Ariadne, No. 21, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue21/pubmed/intro.html
6. Day, M. (2001), “E-print services and long-term access to the record of scholarly and scientific research”, Ariadne, No. 28, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/metadata/intro.html
7. Delamothe, A. (2001), “Navigating across medicine's electronic landscape, stopping at places with Pub or Central in their names”, BMJ, Vol. 323, pp. 1120-2.
8. Dodd, D. (2002), “Open and shut case”, Information World Review, No. 179, p. 9.
9. Eisen, M. and Brown, P. (2001), “Should the scientific literature be privately owned and controlled?”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/Eisen.htm
10. Frank, M. (2001), “No free lunch!”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/frank.html
11. Grivell, L. (2001), “E-BioSci, digital archives, databases, and the changing face of publishing”, Serials, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 183-8.
12. Harnad, S. (2001), “The self-archiving initiative”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/harnad.html
13. Hopkins, C. (2001), “Health warning: ‘This journal supports full text, tariff-free archives’”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/hopkins.html
14. Jacobson, M.W. (2000), “Biomedical publishing and the Internet: Evolution or revolution?”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 230-3, available at: www.pubmedcentral.org/articlerender.fcgi?artid=61425
15. Johnson, R.A. (2000), “A question of access: SPARC, BioOne, and society-driven electronic publishing”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 6 No. 5, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/may00/johnson/05johnson.html
16. Karow, J. (2001), “Publish free or perish: Life scientists are urging publishers to grant free access to archived research articles”, Scientific American: Explore!, April 23, available at: www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&articleID=000A524D-9708-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21
17. Keller, M.A. (2001a), “Innovation and service in scientific publishing requires more, not less, competition”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/keller.html
18. Keller, M.A. (2001b), “The changing role and form of scientific journals”, in 2nd Joint ICSU Press – Unesco Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science, available at: Users.ox.ac.uk/ icsuinfo/kellerfin.htm
19. Kling, R. and McKim, G. (2000), “Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51 No. 14, pp. 1306-20.
20. Lawrence, S. (2001), “Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/lawrence.html
21. Markovitz, B.P. (2000), “Biomedicine's electronic publishing paradigm shift: Copyright policy and Pub Med Central”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 222-9, available at: www.pubmedcentral.org/articlerender.fcgi?artid=61424
22. Pinfield, S. (2001), “How do physicists use an E-print archive?”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 7 No. 12, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html
23. Rowe, R.R. (2001), “Digital archives: How can we provide access to ‘old’ biomedical information?”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/rowe.html
24. Sequeira, E., McEntyre, J. and Lipman, D. (2001), “PubMed Central decides to decentralise”, Nature Web Debates, available at: www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/pubmed.html
25. Smith, R. (1997), “Peer review: Reform or revolution?”, BMJ, Vol. 315 No. 7111, pp. 759-60, available at: bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7111/759?maxtoshow&HITS=10&RE
26. Van de Sompel, H. (2000), “The Santa Fe convention of the open archives initiative”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 6 No. 2, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html
27. White, M. (2001), “Behind the firewall – electronic access to scientific journals: Problems, problems”, EContent Magazine, available at: www.ecmag.net/Magazine/Columns/firewall12_01.html