Biomedical publishing and the Internet: Evolution or revolution?

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 230-233

  Jacobson, Michael W ^a,b  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATENT; PUBLISHING; REVIEW;

EID: 0034023448     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070230     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Bachrach S, Berry S, Blume M, et al. Who should own scientific papers? Science. 1998;281:1459-60. Also available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/ 1459. Accessed Aug 16 1999.
2. LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al. The death of biomedical journals. BMJ. 1995;314:387-90.
3. Walker TJ. Free Internet access to traditional journals. Am Sei. 1998;86(5). Also available at: http://www.amsci.org/ amsci/articles/98articles/walker.html. Accessed Aug 16, 1999.
4. Dyson E. Intellectual value. Wired. Jul 1995:136ff.
5. Markovitz B. Biomedicine's electronic publishing paradigm shift: copyright policy and PubMed Central. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:222-9.
6. Harnad S, Hemus M. All or none: no stable hybrid or halfway solutions for launching the learned periodical literature into the post-Gutenberg galaxy. In: Butterworth I (ed). The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community. London, UK: Portland Press, 1997:18-27. Available at: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/∼harnad/Papers/Harnad/ harnad97.hybrid.pub.html. Accessed Aug 16, 1999.
7. Harnad S. Universal FTP archives for esoteric science and scholarhsip: a subversive proposal. In: Okerson A, O'Donnell J (eds). Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1995.
8. Harnad S. Implementing peer review on the net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In: Peek R, Newby G (eds). Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996:103-18. Also available at: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/∼harnad/Papers/ Harnad/harnad96.peer.review.html. Accessed Aug 16,1999.
9. Harnad S. The post-Gutenberg galaxy: how to get there from here. Inf Soc. 1995;11:285-92. Also available at: http: //cogsci.soton.ac.uk/∼harnad/THES/thes.html. Accessed Aug 16, 1999.
10. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review, part 1. Lancet. 1996;347:1382-6.
11. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review, part 2. Lancet. 1996;347:1459-63.
12. Varmus H. E-biomed: a proposal for electronic publication in the biomedical sciences. May 5, 1999; addendum Jun 20, 1999. National Institutes of Health Web site. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/welcome/director/ebiomed/ebi. htm. Accessed Aug 16, 1999.
13. Relman A. The NIH "E-biomed" proposal: a potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1828-9.