Media priming of presidential and group evaluations

Political Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-40

  McGraw, Kathleen M ^a   Ling, Cristina ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Experiment; Feminists; Media; Priming; Public opinion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037239861     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600390172338     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Ansolabehere, S., Behr, R., & Iyengar, S. (1993). The media game: American politics in the television age. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bartels, L. M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of mass media. American Political Science Review, 87, 267-285.
4. Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.
5. Cook, T. E. (1989). Making laws and making news: Media strategies in the House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179-1206.
7. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Edwards, G. C., Mitchell, W., & Welch, R. (1995). Explaining presidential approval: The significance of issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 108-134.
9. Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10, 155-173.
10. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
14. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Goidel, R. K., Shields, T. G., & Peffley, M. (1997). Priming theory and RAS models: Toward an integrated perspective of media influence. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 287-318.
17. Gurevich, M., & Levy, M. R. (1985). Mass communication review yearbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
19. Hess, S. (1986). The ultimate insiders: U.S. senators in the national media. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20. Hetherington, M. J. (1996). The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 372-395.
21. Huddy, L. (1997). Feminists and feminism in the news. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, the media, and politics (pp. 183-204). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Huddy, L. (1998, September). The social nature of political identity: Feminist image and feminist identity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
23. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Krosnick, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778-787.
26. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20, 365-383.
27. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1994). Issues, candidate image, and priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy's 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review, 88, 527-540.
28. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
29. Kimball, D. C. (1995). Assessing Congress: The priming effects of the partisan context. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Political Methodology Summer Conference, Bloomington, IN.
30. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 778-865). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 659-742). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
33. Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
34. Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-420.
35. McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue salience, and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 41-58.
36. Mendelsohn, M. (1996). The media and interpersonal communications: The priming of issues, leaders, and party identification. Journal of Politics, 58, 112-125.
37. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1996). New media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis. In D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. A. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 79-100). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
39. Miller, S. D., & Sears, D. O. (1986). Stability and change in social tolerance: A test of the persistence hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 214-236.
40. Miller, A. H., Wlezien, C., & Hildreth, A. (1991). A reference group theory of partisan coalitions. Journal of Politics, 53, 1134-1149.
41. Mutz, D. C. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 483-508.
42. Mutz, D. C. (1994). Contextualizing personal experience: The role of mass media. Journal of Politics, 56, 689-714.
43. Norris, P. (1997). Women, the media and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
45. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president's performance. Communication Research, 24, 3-30.
46. Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grass-roots activism. Boston: South End Press.
47. Smith, E. R. (1998), Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Tuchman, C. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
49. Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
50. Weisberg, H. F., Haynes, A., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Social group polarization in 1992. In H. F. Weisberg (Ed.), Democracy's feast: Elections in America (pp. 241-259). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
51. Willnat, L., & Zhu, J. H. (1996). Newspaper coverage and public opinion in Hong Kong: A time-series analysis of media priming. Political Communication, 13, 231-246.