Spin-based quantum-information processing with semiconductor quantum dots and cavity QED

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Feng, Mang ^a,b   D'Amico, Irene ^a,c   Zanardi, Paolo ^a,c   Rossi, Fausto ^a,c,d  

^a ISI FOUNDATION   (Italy)

^b Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics   (China)

^c INFM   (Italy)

^d POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA PROCESSING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTRONS; EXCITONS; LASER PULSES; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; ULTRAFAST PHENOMENA;

CONDUCTION ELECTRON; PAULI-BLOCKING EFFECTS; QUANTUM COMPUTING; QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING; SINGLE MODE CAVITY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0037238499     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2. P.W. Shor, in Proceeding of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994), p. 116
3. A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996).
4. L.K. Grover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997)
5. 79, 4709 (1997)
6. 80, 4329 (1998).
7. E. Biolatti, R. Lotti, P. Zanardi, and F. Rossi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5647 (2000)
8. E. Biolatti, I. D'Amico, P. Zanardi, and F. Rossi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 075306 (2002).
9. X. Li and Y. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012302 (2000).
10. E. Pazy, E. Biolatti, T. Calarco, I. D'Amico, P. Zanardi, F. Rossi, and P. Zoller, e-print cond-mat/0109337.
11. D. Loss and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998)
12. D.P. DiVicenzo, D. Bacon, J. Kempe, G. Burkard, and K.B. Whaley, Nature (London) 408, 339 (2000).
13. J.M. Kikkawa, I.P. Smorchkova, N. Samarth, and D.D. Awschalom, Science 277, 1284 (1997).
14. A. Imamog̃lu, D.D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).
15. M.S. Sherwin, A. Imamog̃lu, and T. Montroy, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3508 (1999).
16. K.R. Brown, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012307 (2001).
17. D.A. Lidar and L.-A. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017905 (2002).
18. N.H. Bonadeo, G. Chen, D. Gammon, D.S. Katzer, D. Park, and D.G. Steel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2759 (1998).
19. G. Chen, N.H. Bonadeo, D.G. Steel, D. Gammon, D.S. Katzer, D. Park, and L.J. Sham, Science 289, 1906 (2000).
20. P.N. Butcher and D. Cotter, The Elements of Nonlinear Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)
21. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
22. In the text above and in Fig. 1, the effect of the external magnetic field is taken into account, because the magnetic field alon the z axis is needed to remove the degeneracy of the qubit states when EQC is carried out. But if we only consider the implementation of Eq. (3) or any other nonencode quantum computing scheme, such a magnetic field may be unnecessary.
23. J.J. Finley, M. Skalitz, M. Arzberger, A. Zrenner, G. Böhn, and G. Abstreiter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2618 (1998).
24. L. Quiroga and N.F. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2270 (1999).
25. J.A. Gupta, R. Knobel, N. Samarth, and D.D. Awschalom, Science 292, 2458 (2001).