Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the nasometer and the nasalview

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 40-45

  Lewis, Kerry E ^a   Watterson, Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Nasalance; Nasality; NasalView; Nasometer

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CHILD; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NASALANCE SCORE; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHONATION; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VOWEL;

EID: 0037234404     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(2003)040<0040:CONSOF>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Awan SN. Analysis of nasalance: NasalView (the nasalance acquisition system). In: Zigler W, Deger D, eds. Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Whurr: 1998:519-527.
2. Awan SN. Development of a low-cost nasalance acquisition system. In: Powell T, ed. Pathologies of Speech and Language Contributions of Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. New Orleans: ICPLA 1996:211-217.
3. Bressman T, Sader R, Whitehill TL, Awan SN, Zeilhofer HF, Horch HH. Nasalance distance and ratio: two new measures. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:248-256.
4. Dalston RM, Seaver EJ. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairments. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:17-21.
5. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairments. Cleft Palate J. 1991;28:184-187.
6. Fletcher SG. Diagnosing Speech Disorders From Cleft Palate. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1978.
7. Fletcher SG. Theory and instrumentation for quantitative measurement of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:601-609.
8. Fletcher SG, Bishop ME. Measurement of nasality with TONAR. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:610-621.
9. Gildersleeve-Neuman CE, Dalston RM. Nasalance scores in noncleft individuals: why not zero? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:106-111.
10. Hardin MA, Van Demark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgements of hypernasality. Cleft Palate J. 1992;29:346-351.
11. Karnell MP. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;32:145-148.
12. Lewis KE, Watterson T, Quint T. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:584-589.
13. MacKay IR, Kummer AW. Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1994.
14. Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:715-721.
15. SPSS-X. SPSS-X User's Guide. 3rd ed. Chicago: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; 1988.
16. Watterson T, Hinton J, McFarlane S. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:67-73.
17. Watterson T, Lewis KE, Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:293-298.
18. Watterson T, Lewis KE, Foley-Homan N. Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:243-247.