Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 243-247

  Watterson, Thomas ^a   Lewis, Kerry E ^a   Foley Homan, Niamh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Nasalance; Nasometer; Stimulus length

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONSONANT; HUMAN; NOSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH THERAPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VIDEORECORDING; VOWEL;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS; VELOPHARYNGEAL INSUFFICIENCY;

EID: 0032959210     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1999)036<0243:EOSLON>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Carney PJ, Sherman, D. Severity of nasality in three selected speech tasks. J Speech Hear Res 1971;14:396-407.
2. Dalston RM, Seaver EJ. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:17-21.
3. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:184-189.
4. Fletcher SG. Contingencies for bioelectric modification of nasality. J Speech Hear Dis 1972;37:329-346.
5. Fletcher SG, Adams LE, McCutcheon MJ. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. In: Bzoch KR, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little, Brown: 1989:246-257.
6. Hardin MA, Van Demark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:346-351.
7. Karnell MP. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:145-148.
8. Lintz LB, Sherman, D. Phonetic elements and perception of nasality. J Speech Hear Res 1961;4:381-396.
9. MacKay IR, Kummer AW. Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1994.
10. Moore WH, Sommers, RK. Phonetic contexts: their effects on perceived nasality in cleft palate speakers. Cleft Palate J 1973;10:72-83.
11. Nasometer Instruction Manual. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1994.
12. Riski JE. The relationship of nasal air turbulence and nasalance in speakers with VPI. Presented at the fifty-third Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association; 1996; San Diego, California.
13. Spriestersbach DC, Powers GR. Nasality in isolated vowels and connected speech of cleft palate speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1959;2:40-45.
14. SPSS-X User's Guide. 3rd ed. Chicago: SPSS; 1988.
15. Watterson T, Hinton J, McFarlane SC. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:67-73.
16. Watterson T, Lewis KE, Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in LP and HP speech stimuli. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:293-298.