Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium: Equal plant fitness benefits of growth and resistance against herbivory

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 127-137

  Valverde, P L ^a,b   Fornoni, J ^a   Nunez Farfan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Compensation; Datura stramonium; Defensive strategies; Herbivory; Natural selection; Tradeoffs

Indexed keywords

ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE; COMPENSATION; EVOLUTION; HERBIVORY; NATURAL SELECTION; TRADE-OFF;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATURA; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

DATURA; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

DATURA STRAMONIUM;

EID: 0037232479     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00482.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aarssen, L.W. 1995. Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. Oikos 74: 149-156.
2. Aarssen, L.W. & Irwin, D.L. 1991. What selection: herbivory or competition? Oikos 60: 261-262.
3. Abrahamson, W.G. & Weis, A.E. 1997. Evolutionary Ecology Across Three Trophic Levels: Goldenrods, Gall-Makers, and Natural Enemies. Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
4. Avery, A., Satina, S. & Rietsema, J. 1959. Blakeslee: the Genus Datura. The Ronald Press, New York.
5. Belsky, A.J., Carson, W.P., Jensen, C.L. & Fox, G.A. 1993. Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol. Ecol. 7: 109-121.
6. Benner, B.L. & Bazzaz, F.A. 1987. Effects of timing of nutrient addition on competition within and between two annual plant species. J. Ecol. 75: 229-245.
7. Bergelson, J. 1994. The effect of genotype and the environment on cost of resistance in lettuce. Am. Nat. 143: 349-359.
8. Bergelson, J., Dwyer, G. & Emerson, J.J. 2001. Models and data on plant-enemy coevolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35: 496-499.
9. Bilbrough, C.J. & Richards, J.H. 1993. Growth of sagebrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing: mechanism of tolerance. Ecology 74: 481-492.
10. Coley, P.D. 1986. Cost and benefits of defense by tannins in neotropical tree. Oecologia 70: 238-241.
11. Coley, P.D. & Aide, T.M. 1991. Comparisons of herbivory and plant defence in temperate and tropical broad-leaved forest. In: Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions (P. W. Price, T. M. Lewinsonh, T. W. Fernandes & W. W. Benson, eds), pp. 25-49. Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P. & Chapin, F.S. III 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivory defence. Science 230: 895-899.
13. Conover, D.O. & Schultz, E.T. 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 248-252.
14. DaCosta, C.P. & Jones, C.M. 1971. Cucumber beetle resistance and the mite susceptibility controlled by the bitter gene in Cucumis sativa L. Science 172: 1145-1146.
15. Fagerström, T., Larsson, S. & Tenow, O. 1987. On optimal defence in plants. Funct. Ecol. 1: 73-81.
16. Fineblum, W.L. & Rausher, M.D. 1995. Evidence for a trade-off between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377: 517-520.
17. Fornoni, J. & Núñez-Farfán, J. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium: genetic variation and costs for tolerance to defoliation. Evolution 54: 789-797.
18. Fritz, R.S. 1990. Effects of genetic and environmental variation on resistance of willows to sawflies. Oecologia 82: 325-332.
19. Fritz, R.S. & Simms, E.L. 1992. Plant Resistance to Herbivores. Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
20. Gómez, J.M. & Zamora, R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of. Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Am. Nat. 155: 657-668.
21. Han, K. & Lincoln, D.E. 1994. The evolution of carbon allocation to plant secondary metabolites: a genetic analysis of cost in Diplacus aurantiacus. Evolution 48: 1550-1563.
22. Haukioja, E., Ossipov, V., Koricheva, J., Honkanen, T., Larsson, S. & Lempa, K. 1998. Biosynthetic origin of carbon-based secondary compounds: cause of variable responses of woody plants to fertilization? Chemoecology 8: 133-139.
23. Herms, D.A. & Mattson, W.J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67: 283-335.
24. Hochwender, C.G., Marquis, R.J. & Stowe, K.A. 2000. The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 122: 361-370.
25. Jing, S.W. & Coley, P.D. 1990. Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defence in Acer negundo. Oikos 58: 369-377.
26. de Jong, T.J. & van der Meijden, E. 2000. On the correlation to defence and regrowth in plants. Oikos 88: 503-508.
27. Lande, R, & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
28. Marak, H.B., Biere, A. & Van Damme, M.M. 2000. Direct and correlated responses to selection on iridoid glycosides in Plantago lanceolata. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 985-996.
29. Marquis, R.J. 1992. The selective impact of herbivory. In: Plant Resistance to Herbivory and Pathogens. Ecology, Evolution and Genetics (R. S. Fritz & E. L. Simms, eds), pp. 301-325. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Mauricio, R. 2000. Natural selection and the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance as plant defenses. Evol. Ecol. 14: 491-507.
31. Mauricio, R. & Rausher, M.D. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51: 1435-1444.
32. Mauricio, R., Rausher, M.D. & Burdick, D.S. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78: 1301-1311.
33. van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. & Verkaar, H.J. 1988. Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51: 355-363.
34. Metcalf, R.L. 1986. Coevolutionary adaptations of rootworm beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) to cucurbitacins. J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 1109-1124.
35. Mitchell-Olds, T. 1989. FREE-STAT Version 1.10 User Manual. Technical Bulletin 101. Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula.
36. Mitchell-Olds, T. & Shaw, R.G. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149-1161.
37. Mole, S. 1994. Trade-offs and constraints in plant herbivore defence theory: a life-history perspective. Oikos 71: 3-12.
38. Motten, A.F. & Antonovics, J. 1992. Determinants of outcrossing rate in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed. Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 419-427.
39. Nagy, E.S. 1997. Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution 51: 1469-1480.
40. Núñez-Farfán, J. 1991. Biología evolutiva de Datura stramonium L. en el Centro de Mexico: selección natural de la resistencia a los herbívoros, sistema de cruzamiento y variación genética intra e interpoblacional. PhD Dissertation, Centro de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF.
41. Núñez-Farfán, J. & Dirzo, R. 1994. Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium L. Central Mexico: natural selection for resistance to herbivorous insects. Evolution 48: 423-436.
42. Núñez-Farfán, J., Cabrales-Vargas, R.A. & Dirzo, R. 1996. Mating system consequences on resistance to herbivory and life history traits in Datura stramonium. Am. J. Bot. 83: 1041-1049.
43. Pearcy, R.W., Ehleringer, J., Mooney, H.A. & Rundel, P.W. 1989. Plant Physiological Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
44. Pilson, D. 2000. The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol. Ecol. 14: 457-489.
45. Purrington, C.B. 2000. Costs of resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3: 305-308.
46. Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurement of natural selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariance between trait and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.
47. Rausher, M.D. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. Trends Genet. 12: 212-217.
48. Rausher, M.D. & Simms, E.L. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43: 563-572.
49. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
50. Rosenthal, J.P. & Kotanen, P.M. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol 9: 145-148.
51. Rosenthal, J.P. & Welter, S.C. 1995. Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives. Oecologia 102: 146-155.
52. SAS 1995. JMP®. Statistics and Graphics Guide, Version 3.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
53. Shonle, I. & Bergelson, J. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of the trophane alkaloids of Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae). Evolution 54: 778-788.
54. Simms, E.L. 1992. Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. In: Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics (R. S. Fritz. & E. L. Simms, eds), pp. 392-425. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
55. Simms, E.L. & Rausher, M.D. 1987. Costs and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. Am. Nat. 130: 570-581.
56. Simms, E.L. & Rausher, M.D. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. II. Natural selection by insects and costs of resistance. Evolution 43: 573-585.
57. Simms, E.L. & Triplett, J. 1994. Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48: 1973-1985.
58. Stinchcombe, J.R. & Rausher, M.D. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Am. Nat. 158: 376-388.
59. Stowe, K.A. 1998. Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52: 703-712.
60. Stowe, K.A., Marquis, R.J., Hochwender, C.G. & Simms, E.L. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 565-595.
61. Strauss, S. & Agrawal, A. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 179-185.
62. Tiffin, P. 2000. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionary and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat. 155: 128-138.
63. Tiffin, P. & Rausher, M.D. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154: 700-716.
64. Valverde, P.L. 2001. Dinámica evolutiva de la resistance a insectos herbívoros en Datura stramonium. PhD Dissertation, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF.
65. Valverde, P.L., Fornoni, J. & Núñez-Farfán, J. 2001. Defensive role of leaf trichomes in resistance to herbivorous insects in Datura stramonium. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 424-432.
66. Weaver, S.E. & Warwick, S.I. 1984. The biology of Canadian weeds. 64. Datura stramonium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64: 979-991.