Hydroxyapatite composite resin cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 406, Issue , 2003, Pages 253-261

  Turner, Alexander W L ^a   Gillies, R Mark ^a   Svehla, Martin J ^a   Saito, Masanobu ^b   Walsh, William R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b MINAMI OSAKA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; CEMENT; GLYCIDOL; HYDROXYAPATITE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; MONOMER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LEG LENGTHENING; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0037231526     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200301000-00036     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buhler DW, Berlemann U, Oxland TR, Nolte LP: Moments and forces during pedicle screw insertion: In vitro and in vivo measurements. Spine 23:1220-1227, 1998.
2. Cripton PA, Jain GM, Wittenberg RH, Nolte LP: Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments. Spine 25:170-179, 2000.
3. Driessens FC, Planell JA, Boltong MG, et al: Osteotransductive bone cements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 212:427-435, 1998.
4. Edwards WT: Biomechanics of posterior lumbar fixation: Analysis of testing methodologies. Spine 16:1224-1232, 1991.
5. Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, et al: Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine 19:2415-2420, 1994.
6. Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, Uchiyama S, et al: An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine. Spine 22:958-962, 1997.
7. Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML: Biomechanics of Cortical and Trabecular Bone: Implications for Assessment of Fracture Risk. In Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds). Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Ed 2. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven 69-111, 1997.
8. Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, et al: Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 22:2504-2509, 1997.
9. Krag MH: Biomechanics of thoracolumbar spinal fixation: A review. Spine 16:S84-S99, 1991.
10. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, et al: An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine: Design and testing. Clin Orthop 203:75-98, 1986.
11. Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD: Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine 13:27-32, 1988.
12. Kwok AW, Finkelstein JA, Woodside T, et al: Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone. Spine 21:2429-2434, 1996.
13. Law M, Tencer AF, Anderson PA: Caudo-cephalad loading of pedicle screws: Mechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation. Spine 18:2438-2443. 1993.
14. Lotz JC, Hu SS, Chiu DF, et al: Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 22:2716-2723, 1997.
15. McKinley TO, McLain RF, Yerby SA, et al: The effect of pedicle morphometry on pedicle screw loading: A synthetic model. Spine 22:246-252, 1997.
16. McLain RF, McKinley TO, Yerby SA, et al: The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability: A synthetic model. Spine 22:1454-1460, 1997.
17. Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA, et al: Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement. Spine 22:1696-1705, 1997.
18. Myers BS, Belmont Jr PJ, Richardson WJ, et al: The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength. Spine 21:1962-1968, 1996.
19. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, et al: Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 25:858-864, 2000.
20. Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Weber U: Comparison of loads on internal spinal fixation devices measured in vitro and in vivo. Med Eng Phys 19:539-546, 1997.
21. Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Weber U: Changes in the loads on an internal spinal fixator after iliac-crest autograft. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:445-449. 2000.
22. Saito M, Maruoka A, Mori T, et al: Experimental studies on a new bioactive bone cement: Hydroxyapatite composite resin. Biomaterials 15:156-160, 1994.
23. Vaccaro AR, Garfin SR: Internal fixation (pedicle screw fixation) for fusions of the lumbar spine. Spine 20:S157-S1657, 1995.
24. Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W: Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop 284:34-46, 1992.
25. Wittenberg RH, Lee KS, Shea M, et al: Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. Clin Orthop 296:278-287, 1993.
26. Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE, et al: Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. Spine 16:647-652, 1991.
27. Yamagata M, Kitahara H, Minami S, et al: Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine. Spine 17:S51-S54, 1992.
28. Yerby SA, Toh E, McLain RF: Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement: A biomechanical analysis. Spine 23:1657-1661, 1998.
29. Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, McCabe R: Pedicle screw pullout strength: Correlation with insertional torque. Spine 18:1673-1676, 1993.
30. Zhu Q, Lu WW, Holmes AD, et al: The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation: An in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 25:1065-1069, 2000.
31. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, et al: A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 203:99-112, 1986.