Phosphorus utilization efficiency in populations of narrow-leaf birdsfoot trefoil

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 271-284

  Kade, Mariana ^a   Pagani, Eduardo A ^b   Mendoza, Rodolfo E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b Centre de Estudios Farmacologicos y Botanicos   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHORUS;

ECOTYPE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; LEGUME; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; PHOSPHORUS;

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CLONING; CULTIVATED LAND; ECOTYPE; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; LEGUME; MYCORRHIZA; NONHUMAN; PASTURE; PHOSPHATE METABOLISM; PLANT LEAF; PLANT MORPHOLOGY; PLANT TISSUE; POPULATION; SHOOT; SOIL; STEM CUTTING;

ARGENTINA;

LOTUS; LOTUS CORNICULATUS; ORNITHOPUS PERPUSILLUS;

EID: 0037222382     PISSN: 00103624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120017431     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Turresson, G. The genotypical response of the plant species to its habitat. Hereditas 1922, 3, 211-350.
2. Ennos, R.A. Maintenance of genetic variation in plant populations. Evol. Biol. 1983, 16, 129-155.
3. Evans, R.C.; Turkington, R. Maintenance of morphological variation in a biotically patchy environment. New Phytol. 1988, 109, 369-376.
4. Bradshaw, A.D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 1965, 13, 115-155.
5. Lovett Doust, L. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). II. The dynamics of leaves, and reciprocal transplant-replant experiment. J. Ecol. 1981, 69, 757-768.
6. Scheiner, S.M.; Goodnight, C.J. The comparison of phenotypic plasticity and genetic variation in populations of the grass Danthonia spicata. Evolution 1984, 38 (4), 845-855.
7. Kade, M.; Pagani, E.A.; Mendoza, R.E. Caracterización morfológica en poblaciones de Lotus glaber de la Pampa Deprimida. Gayana Bot. 2000, 57, 95-96.
8. Stoffella, S.L.; Posse, G.; Collantes, M.B. Variabilidad fenotípica y genotípica de poblaciones de Lotus tenuis que habitan suelos con distinto pH. Ecol. Aust. 1998, 8, 57-63.
9. Vignolio, O.R.; Fernández, O.N.; Maceira, N.O. Flooding tolerance in five populations of Lotus glaber Mill. (Syn. L. tenuis Waldst. et Kit.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1999, 50, 555-559.
10. Williams, D.G.; Mack, R.N.; Black, R.A. Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 1995, 76 (5), 1569-1580.
11. Aerts, R.; Chapin, F.S., III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2000, 30, 1-67.
12. Tinker, P.B. Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on plant nutrition and plant growth. Physiol. Veg. 1978, 16, 43-751.
13. Mendoza, R.E.; Pagani, E.A. Influence of phosphorus nutrition on mycorrhizal growth response and morphology of mycorrhizae in Lotus tenuis. J. Plant Nutr. 1997, 20 (6), 625-639.
14. Mendoza, R.E.; Pagani, E.A.; Pomar, M.C. Variabilidad poblacional de Lotus glaber en relación con la absorción de fósforo del suelo. Ecol. Austral 2000, 10, 3-14.
15. USDA, USDA Soil Soil Taxonomy, 2nd Ed.; U.S. Government Printing Offce: Washington, DC, 1999.
16. Ozanne, P.G.; Keay, J.; Biddiscombe, E.F. The comparative applied phosphate requirements of eight annual pasture species. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1969, 20, 809-818.
17. Beuselinck, P.R.; Ben Younes, M.; McGraw, R.L. Taxonomic investigation of an accession of lotus spp. Crop Sci. 1986, 26, 661-664.
18. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489-500.
19. Newman, E.I. A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 1966, 3, 139-146.
20. Jackson, M.L. Análisis químico de suelos, 2da. Ed.; Omega: Barcelona, 1970; 662 pp.
21. Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Utilization Index: a modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 1981, 4 (3), 289-302.
22. Mendoza, R.E.; Gigli, S. Relative effectiveness of phosphorus on narrow-leaf and broadleaf birdsfoot trefoil growth and the effect of added phosphorus on vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection. J. Plant Nutr. 1995, 18 (7), 1483-1494.
23. Ayala Torales, A.T.; Deregibus, V.A.; Moauro, P.R. Differential response of forage legumes to phosphorus application. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2000, 43, 473-480.
24. Collantes, M.B.; Stoffella, S.L.; Ginzo, H.D.; Kade, M. Productividad y composición botánica divergente de dos variantes florísticas de un pastizal natural de la Pampa Deprimida fertilizadas con N y P. Rev. Fac. Agron. La Plata 1998, 103 (1), 45-59.
25. Aerts, R. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50 (330), 29-37.
26. Wilson, S.D.; Tilman, D. Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments. Ecology 1995, 76, 1169-1180.
27. Steenbjerg, F.; Jakobsen, S.T. Plant nutrition and yield curves. Soil Sci. 1963, 95, 69-90.
28. Gourley, C.J.P.; Allan, D.L.; Russelle, M.P. Plant nutrient efficiency: a comparison of definitions and suggested improvement. Plant Soil 1994, 158, 29-37.
29. Blair, G.J.; Wilson, E.J. Phosphorus efficiency in pasture species. IV. Yield, efficiency parameters and partitioning of P in two white clover accessions under varying levels of P supply in solution culture. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1990, 4, 1071-1082.