On the evaluation of agent behaviors

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-17

  Mali, Amol Dattatraya ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Milwaukee   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; Autonomy; Behaviors; Evaluation; Robotics

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; MOBILE ROBOTS; MOTION CONTROL; ROBOT LEARNING;

ROBOT BEHAVIORS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 0037215990     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00358-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arkin R.C. Behavior-based robot navigation for extended domains. Adapt. Behav. 1:(2):1992;201-225.
2. Arkin R.C., Fujita M., Takagi T., Hasegawa R. Ethological modeling and architecture for an entertainment robot. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Seoul, Korea. 2001;453-458.
3. Birk A., Holger K. An industrial application of behavior-oriented robotics. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Seoul, Korea. 2001;749-754.
4. Brooks R.A. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robotics Automation. 2:(1):1986;14-23.
5. Cameron J.M., MacKenzie D.C., Ward K.R., Arkin R.C., Book W.J. Reactive control for mobile manipulation. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3, ICRA, Atlanta, GA. 1993.
6. Chapman D. Planning for conjunctive goals. Artificial Intelligence. 32:(3):1987;333-377.
7. Connell J. Minimalist Mobile Robotics, A Colony Style Architecture for an Artificial Creature. 1990;Academic Press, New York.
8. Desai R., Rosenberg C., Jones J. Kaa: An autonomous serpentine robot uses behavior control. Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, IROS, Pittsburgh, PA. 1995;250-255.
9. Emery R., Balch T. Behavior-based control of a non-holonomic robot in pushing tasks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Seoul, Korea. 2001;2381-2388.
10. Endo Y., Arkin R.C. Implementing Tolman's schematic Sowbug: Behavior-based robotics in the 1930s. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Seoul, Korea. 2001;477-484.
11. Kirsh D. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence. 47:(1-3):1991;161-184.
12. MacKenzie D.C., Arkin R.C. Behavior-based mobile manipulation for drum sampling. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Minneapolis, MN. 1996;2389-2395.
13. Maes P., Brooks R. Learning to co-ordinate behaviors. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-90, Boston, MA. 1990;796-802.
14. Mahadevan S., Connell J. Automatic programming of behavior-based robots using reinforcement learning. Artificial Intelligence. 55:1992;311-365.
15. A. Mali, On the evaluation of behavior-based agency, Technical Report, Department of Electrical Engineering and computer science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, July 2002.
16. Miller D., Desai R., Gat E., Ivlev R., Loch J. Reactive navigation through rough terrain: Experimental results. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-92, San Jose, CA. 1992;823-828.
17. Montgomery J., Fagg A., Bekey G. The USC AFV-I. IEEE Expert. 10:(2):1995.
18. Reiter R. The frame problem in the situation calculus: A simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression. Lifschitz V. Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy. 1991;359-380 Academic Press, New York.
19. Vera A.H., Simon H.A. Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Sci. 17:1993;7-48.
20. Wettergreen D., Pangels H., Bares J. Behavior-based gait execution for the Dante-II walking robot. Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, IROS, Pittsburgh, PA. 1995;274-279.