Abundance and demography of the Hawaiian hawk: Is delisting warranted?

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 165-176

  Klavitter, John L ^a   Marzluff, John M ^a   Vekasy, Mark S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Hawk Watch International   (United States)

Author keywords

'io; Abundance; Buteo solitarius; Delisting; Demography; Downlisting; Elasticity analyses; Fecundity; Finite rate of increase; Hawaii; Hawaiian hawk; Survival

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION STATUS; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FECUNDITY; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; POPULATION SIZE; RAPTOR; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SURVIVAL;

HAWAII; UNITED STATES;

ACCIPITRINAE; AVES; BUTEO; BUTEO SOLITARIUS; GALLIFORMES; HAWAIIA; RAPTORES;

EID: 0037214685     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3803072     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory and extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in B. N. Petran and F. Csaki, editors. Second international symposium on information theory. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
2. AKCAKAYA, H. R. 1999. RAMAS GIS: Linking landscape data with population viability analysis. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, USA.
3. BANKO, W. E. 1980. Avian history report 6A. History of endemic Hawaiian birds. Part 1. Population histories - species accounts. Cooperative National Park Resource Studies Unit, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
4. BEISSINGER, S. R., AND M. I. WESTPHAL. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:821-841.
5. BERGER, A. J. 1981. Hawaiian birdlife. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, USA.
6. BERGER, D. D., AND H. C. MUELLER. 1959. The bal-chatri: a trap for birds of prey. Bird Banding 30:18-26.
7. BROOK, B. W., AND J. KIKKAWA. 1998. Examining threats faced by island birds: a population viability analysis on the Capricorn silvereye using long-term data. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:491-503.
8. BUCKLAND, S. T., D. R. ANDERSON, K. P. ANDERSON, K. P. BURNHAM, AND J. L. LAAKE. 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations, Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
9. BUEHLER, D. A., J. D. FRASER, M. R. FULLER, L. S. MCALLISTER, AND J. D. SEEGAR. 1995. Captive and field tested radio attachment techniques for bald eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 66:173-180.
10. CASWELL, H. 1989. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
11. _. 2000. Prospective and retrospective perturbation analyses: their roles in conservation biology. Ecology 81:619-627.
12. CLARKSON, K., AND L. LANIAWE. 2000. Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius). Pages 1-16 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, no. 523. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
13. CUDDIHY, L. W., AND C. P. STONE. 1990. Alteration of native Hawaiian vegetation: effects of humans, their activities and introductions. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, USA.
14. DE KROON, H., J. VAN GROENENDAEL, AND J. EHRLEN. 2000. Elasticities: a review of methods and model limitations. Ecology 81:607-618.
15. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (ESRI). 1998. Arcview 3.1. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA.
16. FAABORG, J. 1986. Reproductive success and survivorship of the Galapagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): potential costs and benefits of cooperative polyandry. Ibis 128:337-347.
17. GRIFFIN, C. R. 1985. Biology of the Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius). Dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
18. _. 1989. Raptors in the Hawaiian islands. Pages 155-160 in B. Pendleton, editor. Western raptor management symposium and workshop. Science Technical Series, No. 12. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C., USA.
19. _, P. W. C. PATON, AND T. S. BASKETT. 1998. Breeding ecology and behavior of the Hawaiian hawk. Condor 100:654-662.
20. HALL, L. S., M. L. MORRISON, AND P. H. BLOOM. 1997. Population status of the endangered Hawaiian hawk. Journal of Raptor Research 31:11-15.
21. HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM. 1998. Private residential construction and demolition authorized by permits, by counties: 1993 to 1998. http://www.hawaii.gov/dbedt/db98/index.html. Accessed 1 May 2000.
22. HEPPELL, S. S., H. CASWELL, AND L. B. CROWDER. 2000. Life histories and elasticity patterns: perturbation analysis for species with minimal demographic data. Ecology 81:654-665.
23. HILL, G. E. 1993. House finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Pages 1-24 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, no. 46. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
24. INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 1994. Red list categories. Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.
25. ISLAM, K. 1999. Erckel's francolin (Francolinus erckelii), black francolin (Francolinus francolinus), and gray francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus). Pages 1-24 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, no. 394-396. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
26. JACOBI, J. D. 1990. Distribution maps, ecological relationships, and status of native plant communities on the island of Hawaii. Dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA.
27. KENNEDY, P. L. 1997. The northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis): is there evidence of a population decline? Journal of Raptor Research 31:95-106.
28. KLAVITTER, J. L. 2000. Survey methodology, abundance, and demography of the endangered Hawaiian hawk: is delisting warranted? Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
29. LAAKE, J. L., S. T. BUCKLAND, D. R. ANDERSON, AND K. P. BURNHAM. 1993. Distance user's guide, version 2.0. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
30. LESLIE, P. H. 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:183-212.
31. _. 1948. Some further notes on the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 35:213-245.
32. LINDSEY, G. D., AND S. M. MOSHER. 1994. Tests indicate minimal hazard to 'io from diphacinone baiting. Hawaii's Forests and Wildlife 9:4.
33. MORRISON, M. L., L. S. HALL, AND P. H. BLOOM. 1994. Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius) population survey. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
34. MURRAY, B. G., JR. 1985. Evolution of clutch size in tropical species of birds. Ornithological Monographs 36:505-519.
35. NEWTON, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA.
36. NOECKER, R. J. 1998. Endangered species list revisions: a summary of delisting and downlisting. Congressional Research Service. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., USA.
37. OLSON, S. L., AND H. F. JAMES. 1982. Fossil birds from the Hawaiian Islands: evidence for wholesale extinction by man before western contact. Science 217:633-635.
38. _, AND _. 1991. Ornithological monograph No. 45: descriptions of thirty-two new species of birds from the Hawaiian islands: part 1. Non-passeriformes. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
39. _, AND _. 1996. Prehistoric status and distribution of the Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius), with the first fossil record from Kauai. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 49:65-69.
40. OREINSTEIN, R. 1968. Birds of the Crowder "birds of Hawaii" tour, December 23, 1967 to January 5, 1968. 'Elepaio 29:21-27.
41. PRESTON, C. R., AND R. D. BEANE. 1993. Red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). Pages 1-24 in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, no. 52. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
42. SAETHER, B. E., AND O. BAKKE. 2000. Avian life history, variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642-653.
43. SANTANA, C. E., AND S. A. TEMPLE. 1988. Breeding biology and diet of red-tailed hawks in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 20:151-160.
44. SCOTT, J. M., J. D. JACOBI, AND F. L. RAMSEY. 1981. Avian surveys of large geographical areas: a systematic approach. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9:190-200.
45. _, S. MOUNTAINSPRING, F. RAMSEY, AND C. KEPLER. 1986. Forest bird communities of the Hawaiian islands: their dynamics, ecology, and conservation. Studies in Avian Biology No. 9.
46. SEBER, G. A. F. 1973. The estimation of animal abundance. Griffin, Inc., London, United Kingdom.
47. SPILLER, D. A., J. B. LOSOS, AND T. W. SCHOENER. 1998. Impact of a catastrophic hurricane on island populations. Science 281:695-697.
48. SPOT. 1994. Systeme pour l'observation de la terre (SPOT). Hawaii statewide XS coverage. CD-ROM, order 3467006003. SPOT Image Corporation, Reston, Virginia, USA.
49. STEENHOF, K. 1987. Assessing raptor reproductive success and productivity. Pages 151-170 in B. A. Giron Pendleton, B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline, and D. M. Bird, editors. Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C., USA.
50. _, AND M. N. KOCHERT. 1982. An evaluation of methods used to estimate raptor nesting success. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:85-93.
51. THOMAS, L., J. LAAKE, J. F. DERRY, S. BUCKLAND, D. BORCHERS, D. ANDERSON, K. BURNHAM, S. STRINDBERG, S. L. HEDLEY, M. L. BURT, F. MARQUES, J. H. POLLARD, AND R. M. FEWSTER. 1998. Distance version 3.5, release 5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
52. TOMICH, P. Q. 1986. Mammals in Hawaii. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
53. U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 1998. County population estimates and demographic components of population change: annual time series, July 1, 1990 to July 1, 1998. http://www.hawaii.gov/abedt/db98/01/014798.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2000.
54. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1984. Hawaiian hawk recovery plan. USFWS, Portland, Oregon, USA.
55. _. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; withdrawal of proposed rule to reclassify the Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius) from endangered to threatend. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
56. _. 1999a. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposes to remove Tinian monarch from Endangered Species Act protection. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
57. _ 1999b. Listings and recovery plans. http://endangered.fws.gov/boxscore.html. Accessed 27 October 1999.
58. _. 2000. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Ecoregion homepage: endangered species. http://www.rl.fws.gov/pacific/wesa/endspindex.html. Accessed 2 May 2000.
59. VAN RIPER III, C., S. G. VAN RIPPER, M. L. GOFF, AND M. LAIRD. 1986. The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Zoological Monographs 56:327-344.
60. VEKASY, M. S., J. M. MARZLUFF, M. N. KOCHERT, R. N. LEHMAN, AND K. STEENHOF. 1996. Influence of radio transmitters on prairie falcons. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:680-690.
61. WISDOM, M. J., L. S. MILLS, AND D. F. DOAK. 2000. Life stage simulation analysis: estimating vital-rate effects on population growth for conservation. Ecology 81:628-641.
62. WOLFRAM RESEARCH. 1999. MATHEMATICA. Wolfram Research, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
63. WORK, T. M., J. G. MASSEY, B. A. RIDEOUT, C. H. GARDINER, D. B. LEDIG, O. C. H. KWOK, AND J. P. DUBEY. 2000. Fatal toxoplasmosis in free-ranging endangered 'alala from Hawaii (Corvus hawaiiensis). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36:205-212.
64. ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
65. ZELENAK, J. R., AND J. J. ROTELLA. 1997. Nest success and productivity of ferruginous hawks in northern Montana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:1035-1041.