Different geometric shaped hydrogel theophylline tablets: Statistical approach for estimating drug release

Farmaco

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 939-945

  Karasulu, H Yeşim ^a   Ertan, Gökhan ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analysis of covariance; Geometric shaped matrix tablets; HPMC; Mathematical equation; Theophylline

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE; POLYMER; THEOPHYLLINE;

ARTICLE; ASSAY; CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; DRUG INACTIVATION; DRUG SOLUBILITY; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEL; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATRIX TABLET; SOLID STATE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037210290     PISSN: 0014827X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-827X(02)01297-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ford J., Rubinstain M.H., Hogan J.E., Edgar A.J. Importance of drug type, tablet shape, added diluents on drug release from hydropropylmethylcellulose matrix tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 40:1987;223-234.
2. Siepmann J., Peppas N.A. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:2001;139-157.
3. Shah N., Zhang G., Apelian V., Zeng F., Infeld M.H., Malick A.W. Prediction of drug release from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) matrices: effect of polymer concentration. Pharm. Res. 10:1993;1693-1695.
4. Abrahamson B., Alpsten M., Bake B., Larsson A., Sjogren J. In vitro and in vivo erosion of two different hydrophilic gel matrix tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 46:1998;69-75.
5. Shah N.H., Railkar A.S., Phuapradit W., Zeng F.W., Chen A., Infeld M.H., Malick A.W. Effect of processing techniques in controlling the release rate and mechanical strengh of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based hydrogel matrices. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 42:1996;183-187.
6. Reynolds T.D., Gehrke S.H., Hussain A.S., Shenoouda L.S. Polymer erosion and drug release characterization of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:1998;1115-1123.
7. Siepmann J., Podual K., Sriwongjanya M., Peppas N.A., Bodmeier R. A new model describing the swelling and drug release kinetics from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose tablets. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:2000;1290-1298.
8. J. Siepmann, N.A. Peppas, Hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery: An improved mathematical model to predict the resulting drug release kinetics (the 'sequential layer' model), Pharm. Res. 17 (2000) 1290-1298.
9. Katzhendler I., Hoffman A., Goldberger A., Friedman M. Modeling of drug release from erodible tablets. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:1997;110-115.
10. Lee P.I. Kinetic of drug release from hydrogel matrices. J. Controlled Release. 2:1985;277-288.
11. Sanghavi N.M., Kamath P.R., Amin D.S. Sustained release tablets of theophylline. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 16:1990;1843-1848.
12. Ertan G., Karasulu E., Demirtaş D., Arici M., Güneri T. Release characteristics of implantable cylindrical polyethylene matrices. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 49:1997;229-235.
13. Fassihi A.R., Parker M.S. Controlled drug release from acompressed heterogeneous polymeric matrix: kinetics of release. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 12:1986;1649-1661.
14. Brooke D., Washkuhn R.J. Zero-order drug delivery system: theory and preliminary testing. J. Pharm. Sci. 66:1977;159-162.
15. Cobby J., Mayersohn M., Walker G.C. Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets I: theoretical. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:1974;725-731.
16. Lipper R.A., Higuchi W.I. Analysis of theoretical behaviour of a proposed zero-order drug delivery system. J. Pharm. Sci. 66:1977;163-164.
17. Rippie E.G., Johnson J.R. Regulation of dissolution rate by pellet geometry. J. Pharm. Sci. 58:1969;428-431.
18. Siepmann J., Kranz H., Peppas N.A., Bodmeier R. Calculation of the required size and shape of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices to achieve desired drug release profiles. Int. J. Pharm. 201:2000;151-164.
19. Roseman T.J. Release of steroids from a silicone polymer. J. Pharm. Sci. 61:1972;46-50.
20. Sangalli M.E., Giunchedi P., Maggi L., Conte U., Gazzaniga A. Inert monolithic device with a central hole for constant drug release. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 40:1994;370-373.
21. Hopfenberg H.B. In controlled release polymeric formulations. Paul D.R., Haris F.W., ACS Symposium Series. 33:1976;26-31 American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
22. Karasulu H.Y., Ertan G., Köse T. Modeling of theophylline release from different geometrical erodible tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 49:2000;177-182.
23. Parab P.V., Oh C.K., Ritschel W.A. Sustained release from pecirol (glycerol palmito-stearate) matrix: effect of mannitol and hydroxpropyl methylcellulose on the release of theophylline. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 12:1986;1309-1327.
24. Kormeyer R.W., Gurny R., Doelker E., Buri P., Peppas N.A. Mechanisms of potassium chloride release from compressed, hydrophilic polymeric matrices: effect of entrapped air. J. Pharm. Sci. 72:1983;1189-1191.
25. Cobby J., Mayersohn M., Walker G.C. Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets II: theoretical. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:1974;732-737.
26. Lieberman A.H., Lachman L. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets. I:1980;80 Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel.