Soil, climate, and management impacts on regional wheat productivity in Mexico from remote sensing

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 114, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 31-43

  Lobell, David B ^a,b   Ortiz Monasterio, J Ivan ^c   Addams, C Lee ^b   Asner, Gregory P ^a,b  

^a GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Carbon cycle; Climate impacts; Remote sensing; Wheat; Yield; Yield loss

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; REMOTE SENSING; WHEAT;

MEXICO;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0037203052     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00138-7     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Casmann, K.G., 1999. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 5952-5959.
2. Cassman, K.G., Pingali, P.L., 1995. Extrapolating trends from long-term experiments to farmers' fields: the case of irrigated rice systems in Asia. In: Barnett, V., Payne, R., Steiner, R. (Eds.), Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Statistical Considerations. Wiley, New York, pp. 63-84.
3. Curran, P.J., Atkinson, P.M., 1998. Geostatistics and remote sensing. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 22 (1), 61-78.
4. Döös, B.R., Shaw, R., 1999. Can we predict the future food production? A sensitivity analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 9 (4), 261-283.
5. Field, C.B., Randerson, J.T., Malmström, C.M., 1995. Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 51 (1), 74-88.
6. IPCC, 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, IPCC Working Group 2.
7. Lobell, D.B., Asner, G.P., Ortiz-Monasterio, J.I., Benning, T.L., 2002a. Remote sensing of regional crop production in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico: Estimates and uncertainties. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., (in press).
8. Lobell, D.B., et al., 2002b. Satellite estimates of productivity and light use efficiency in United States agriculture, 1982-1998. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 722-735.
9. Malmström, C.M., et al., 1997. Interannual variation in global-scale net primary production: Testing model estimates, Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 367-392.
10. Matson, P.A., Naylor, R., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., 1998. Integration of environmental, agronomic, and economic aspects of fertilizer management. Science 280, 112-114.
11. Monteith, J.L., 1972. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 747-766.
12. Monteith, J.L., 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 277-294.
13. Penning de Vries, W.T.P., Rabbinge, R., Groot, J.J.R., 1997. Potential and attainable food production and food security in different regions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 352 (1356), 917-928.
14. Pielke, R.A., et al., 1998. Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: Influence on weather and climate. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 461-457.
15. Pingali, P.L., Rajaram, S., 1999. Global wheat research in a changing world: Options and sustaining growth in wheat productivity. In: Pingali, P.L. (Ed.), CIMMYT 1998-1999 World Wheat Facts and Trends. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.
16. Sahai, H., Ageel, M.I., 2000. The Analysis of Variance. Birkhaüser, Boston, 742 pp.
17. Schimel, D.S., et al., 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414 (6860) 169-172.