Nested MWC model describes hydrolysis of GroEL without assuming negative cooperativity in binding

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics

Volumn 1599, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 45-55

  Hellmann, Nadja ^a   Decker, Heinz ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ATP hydrolysis; Conformation; Cooperativity; Folding; GroEL; Nucleotide binding

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; ADENOSINE 5' O (3 THIOTRIPHOSPHATE); ADENOSINE 5'-O-(3-THIOTRIPHOSPHATE); DRUG DERIVATIVE;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE; MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM;

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROEL PROTEIN; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING;

EID: 0037163402     PISSN: 15709639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1570-9639(02)00399-0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hendrick J.P., Hartl F.U. The role of molecular chaperones in protein folding. FASEB J. 9:1995;1559-1569.
2. Lorimer G. A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo. FASEB J. 10:1996;1-5.
3. Buchner J. Supervising the fold: functional principles of molecular chaperones. FASEB J. 10:1996;10-19.
4. Sigler P.B., Xu Z., Rye H.S., Burton S.G., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:1998;581-608.
5. Ellis R.J. Molecular chaperones: pathways and networks. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;R137-R139.
6. Houry W.A., Frishman D., Eckerskorn C., Lottspeich F., Hartl F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 402:1999;147-154.
7. Bhattacharyya A.M., Horovitz P.M. The aggregation state of rhodanese during folding influences the ability of GroEL to assist reactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;28739-28743.
8. Horovitz A., Fridmann Y., Kafir G., Yifrach O. Review: allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;104-114.
9. Shtilerman M., Lorimer G.H., Englander S.W. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science. 284:1999;822-825.
10. Grallert H., Buchner J. Review: a structural view of the GroE chaperone cycle. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;95-103.
11. Todd M.J., Viitanen P.V., Lorimer G.H. Hydrolysis of ATP by E. coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium. Biochemistry. 32:1993;8560-8567.
12. Yifrach O., Horowitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonine GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;5303-5308.
13. Kovalenko O., Yifrach O., Horowitz A. Residue Lys-34 on GroES modulates allosteric transitions in GroEL. Biochemistry. 33:1994;14974-14978.
14. Aharoni A., Horowitz A. Inter-ring communication is disrupted in the GroEL mutant Arg13→Gly, Ala126→Val with known crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;732-735.
15. Inbar E., Horowitz A. GroES promotes the T to R transition of the GroEL ring distal to GroES in the GroES-GroEL complex. Biochemistry. 36:1997;12276-12281.
16. Makio T., Takasu-Ishikawa E., Kuwajima K. Nucleotide-induced transition of GroEL from the high-affinity to the low-affinity state for a target protein: effects of ATP and ADP on the GroEL-affected refolding of alpha-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 312:2001;555-567.
17. Shiseki K., Murai N., Motohia F., Hisabori T., Yoshida M., Taguchi H. Synchronized domain-opening motion of GroEL is essential for communication between the two rings. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;11335-11338.
18. Braig K., Adams P.D., Brünger A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1-4.
19. Boisvert D.C., Wang J., Otwinowski Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
20. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
21. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
22. Roseman A.M., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H.R. The chaperonine ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
23. Roseman A.M., Ranson N.A., Gowen B., Fuller S.D., Saibil H.R. Structures of unliganded and ATP-bound states of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL by cryoelectron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;115-125.
24. Ma J., Sigler P.B., Karplus M. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;303-313.
25. Yifrach O., Horowitz A. Two lines of allosteric communications in the oligomeric chaperonine GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196→Ala. J. Mol. Biol. 243:1994;397-401.
26. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255:1996;356-361.
27. Neet K.E. Cooperativity in enzyme function: equilibrium and kinetic aspects. Methods Enzymol. 249:1995;519-567.
28. 2 heterooligomers involved in protein release during the chaperonin cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;16180- 16186.
29. Burston G., Ranson N.A., Clark A.R. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;138-152.
30. Jackson G.S., Staniforth R.A., Halsall D.J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J.J., Clarke A.R., Burston S.G. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonine catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 32:1993;2554-2563.
31. Terada T.P., Kuwajima K. Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL studied by isothermal titration calorimetry: evidence for non-cooperative nucleotide binding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1431:1999;269-281.
32. Inobe T., Makio T., Takasu-Ishikawa E., Terada T.P., Kuwajima K. Nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL: non-cooperative binding of ATP analogs and ADP, and cooperative effect of ATP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1545:2001;160-173.
33. Robert C., Decker H., Richey B., Gill S.J., Wyman J. Nesting: hierarchies of allosteric interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84:1987;1891-1895.
34. Decker H., Robert C.H., Gill S.J. Nesting - an extension of the allosteric model and its application to tarantula hemocyanin. Linzen B. Invertebrate Oxygen Carrier. 1986;383-388 Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
35. Decker H., Connelly P., Robert C.H., Gill S.J. Nested allosteric interaction in tarantula hemocyanin revealed through the binding of oxygen and carbon monoxide. Biochemistry. 27:1988;6901-6908.
36. Decker H., Sterner R. Nested allostery of arthropodan hemocyanin (Eurypelma californicum and Homarus americanus): the role of the protons. J. Mol. Biol. 211:1990;281-293.
37. Di Cera E., Hopfner K.P., Dang Q.D. Theory of allosteric effects in serine proteases. Biophys. J. 70:1996;174-181.
38. Monod J., Wyman J., Changeux J.-P. On the nature of allosteric transition: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:1965;88-118.
39. Wyman J., Gill S.J. Binding and Linkage. 1990;University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA.
40. Koshland D.E., Nemethy G., Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry. 5:1966;365-385.
41. Arisaka F., van Holde K.E. Allosteric properties and the association equilibria of hemocyanin from Callianassa californiensis. J. Mol. Biol. 134:1979;41-73.
42. Hellmann N., Jaenicke E., Decker H. Two types of urate binding sites on hemocyanin from the crayfish Astacus leptodactylus: an ITC study. Biophys. Chem. 90:2001;279-299.
43. Frieden C. Treatment of enzyme kinetic data. J. Biol. Chem. 239:1964;3522-3531.