Autonomy: The be all end all in rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2002, Pages 993-995

  Kersten, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0037115515     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280210152076     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cardol M, de Jong BA, Ward C. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 970-974.
2. Komrad MS. A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics 1983; 9: 38-44.
3. Sim J. Ethical Decision-making. In: Ethical Decision-Making in Therapy Practice. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1997; 15-39; 110-130.
4. Oliver M. Understanding Disability. From Theory to Practice. London: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1996.
5. Kersten P, George S, McLellan DL, Smith JA, Mullee MA. Disabled people and professionals differ in their perceptions of rehabilitation needs. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2000; 22: 393-399.
6. Sim J. Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 3-10.
7. Stevens A, Raftery J. Introduction. In: A Stevens, J Raftery (eds). Health Care Needs Assessment. The epidemiology Based Needs Assessment Reviews. Oxford Medical Press Ltd., 1994; 11-30.
8. Department of Health The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century, London, Department of Health, 2001.
9. Cardol M, De Haan RJ, De Jong BA, Van den Bos GAM, De Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the questionnaire 'impact on participation and autonomy' (IPA). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 210-216.
10. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 Draft, Full Version. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999.
11. Kendall E, Buys N, Larner J. Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 435-445.