Predicting the temporal responses of non-phase-locking bullfrog auditory units to complex acoustic waveforms

Hearing Research

Volumn 130, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 155-170

  Yamada, Walter Masami ^a   Lewis, Edwin R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Frog basilar papilla; Reverse correlation; Temporal response; Tuning; Wiener kernel

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BULLFROG; FREQUENCY ANALYZER; LATENT PERIOD; NERVE FIBER; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPIKE WAVE; TIME; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AXONS; BASILAR MEMBRANE; FORECASTING; NOISE; RANA CATESBEIANA; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032961795     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00005-2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bodnar D.A., Capranica R.R. Encoding of phase spectra by the peripheral auditory system of the bullfrog. J. Comp. Physiol. A 174:1994;157-171.
2. Bodnar D.A., Vriedlander J.D. The contribution of changes in stimulus temporal features and peripheral nonlinearities to the phase sensitivity of auditory afferents in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Aud. Neurosci. 3:1997;231-254.
3. Carney L.H., Geisler C.D. A temporal analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to spoken stop consonant-vowel syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1986;1896-1914.
4. de Boer E., de Jongh H.R. On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1978;115-135.
5. de Boer E., Kuyper P. Triggered correlation. IEEE Trans. BME. 15:1968;169-179.
6. Eggermont J.J. Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system. Hear. Res. 66:1993;177-201.
7. Feng A.S., Hall J.C., Siddique S. Coding of temporal parameters of complex sounds by frog auditory nerve fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 65:1991;424-445.
8. Geisler C.D., Gamble T. Responses of ''high-spontaneous'' auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:1989;1639-1652.
9. Hillery C.M., Narins P.M. Frequency and time domain comparison of low-frequency auditory fiber responses in two anuran amphibians. Hear. Res. 25:1987;233-248.
10. Hudspeth A.J., Corey D.P. Sensitivity, polarity and conductance changes in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:1977;2407-2411.
11. Javel E. Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1980;133-146.
12. Kumerasen, R., Rao, A., Sanderson, M., Simmons, A., 1996. Signal processing models for the auditory periphery. In: Lewis, E.R., Long, G.R., Lyon, R.F., Narins, P.M., Steele, C.R., Hecht-Poinar, E. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Press, Singapore, pp. 190-196.
13. Lewis E.R., Henry K.R. Nonlinear effects of noise on phase-locked cochlear-nerve responses to sinusoidal stimuli. Hear. Res. 92:1995;1-16.
14. Lewis E.R., Baird R.A., Leverenz E.L., Koyama H. Inner ear: dye injection reveals peripheral origins of specific sensitivities. Science. 215:1982;1641-1643.
15. Lim, D., 1990. Representation of complex sounds in the peripheral auditory nervous system of the green treefrog. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, pp. 1-153.
16. Lim D., Capranica R.R. Measurement of temporal regularity of spike train responses in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog. J. Neurosci. Methods. 52:1990;203-213.
17. Lowenstein O. Peripheral mechanisms of equilibrium. Br. Med. Bull. 12:1956;114-118.
18. Marmarelis V.Z. Modeling methodology for nonlinear physiological systems. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25:1997;239-251.
19. Marmarelis, P.Z., Marmarelis, V.Z., 1978. Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White Noise Approach. Plenum, New York.
20. Miller M.I., Sachs M.B. Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 14:1984;257-279.
21. Ronken D.A. Basic properties of auditory nerve responses from a ''simple'' ear: the basilar papilla of the frog. Hear. Res. 47:1990;63-82.
22. Rugh, W., 1981. Nonlinear System Theory: The Volterra/Wiener Approach. Johns-Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
23. Sachs M.B., Voigt H.F., Young E.D. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise. J. Neurophysiol. 50:1983;27-45.
24. Schetzen, M., 1980. The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
25. Schwartz J.J., Simmons A.M. Encoding of spectrally complex communication sound in the bullfrog's auditory nerve. J. Comp. Physiol. 166:1990;489-499.
26. Shofner W.P., Feng A.S. Post-metamorphic development of the frequency selectivities and sensitivities of the peripheral auditory system of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J. Exp. Biol. 93:1981;181-196.
27. Simmons A.M., Ferragamo M. Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. I: Pitch-shift effects. J. Comp. Physiol. A 172:1993;57-69.
28. Simmons A.M., Reese G., Ferragamo M. Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. II: Phase and temporal fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;3374-3389.
29. Simmons A.M., Schwartz J.J., Ferragamo M. Auditory nerve representation of complex communication sound in background noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;2831-2844.
30. Simmons A.M., Shen Y., Sanderson M.I. Neural and computational basis for periodicity extraction in frog peripheral auditory system. Aud. Neurosci. 2:1996;109-123.
31. Sinex A.M., Geisler C.D. Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1983;602-615.
32. Stein, R.B., 1970. The role of spike trains in transmitting and distorting sensory signals. In: Schmitt, F.O. (Ed.), The Neurosciences. Rockefeller Press, New York, pp. 597-604.
33. van Dijk P., Wit H.P., Segenhout J.M., Tubis A. Wiener kernel analysis of inner ear function in the American bullfrog. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;904-919.
34. van Dijk P., Wit H.P., Segenhout J.M. Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. I. Application of high-order Wiener kernel analysis. Hear. Res. 114:1997;229-242.
35. van Dijk P., Wit H.P., Segenhout J.M. Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. II. Temperature dependence of inner-ear function. Hear. Res. 114:1997;243-251.
36. Weiss T.F., Rose C. Stages of degradation of timing information in the cochlea: a comparison of hair-cell and nerve-fiber responses in the alligator lizard. Hear. Res. 33:1988;167-174.
37. Wolodkin, G., Yamada, W.M., Lewis, E.R., Henry, K.R., 1996. Spike rate models for auditory fibers. In: Lewis, E.R., Long, G.R., Lyon, R.F., Narins, P.M., Steele, C.R., Hecht-Poinar, E. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Press, Singapore, pp. 104-110.
38. Yamada, W.M., 1997. Second-order Wiener Kernel Analysis of Auditory Afferent Axons of the North American Bullfrog and Mongolian Gerbil Responding to Noise. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate Group in Neurobiology, University of California, Berkeley.
39. Yamada, W.M., Wolodkin, G., Lewis, E.R., Henry, K.R., 1996. Wiener kernel analysis and the singular value decomposition. In: Lewis, E.R., Long, G.R., Lyon, R.F., Narins, P.M., Steele, C.R., Hecht-Poinar, E. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Press, Singapore, pp. 111-118.
40. Young E.D., Sachs M.B. Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66:1979;1381-1403.
41. Yu X.Y., Lewis E.R. Studies with spike initiators: linearization by noise allows continuous signal modulation in neural networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:1989;36-43.