A novel ionization path of nitric oxide: Resonance, not perturbation, plays a role

ChemPhysChem

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 976-979

  Sun, Zhi Gang ^a   Cong, Shu Lin ^b   Lou, Nan Quan ^a   Han, Ke Li ^a  

^a DALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS   (China)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Femtosecond laser pulse; Nitric oxide; Perturbation; Photoelectron spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

LASER PULSES; NITRIC OXIDE; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOELECTRONS; PHOTONS; ULTRASHORT PULSES;

HIGH INTENSITY; INTENSITY-DEPENDENT; LASER INTENSITIES; PERTURBATION; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTRUM; RESONANCE-ENHANCED IONIZATIONS;

PHOTOIONIZATION;

NITRIC OXIDE;

ARTICLE; IONIZATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHOTON; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0037112642     PISSN: 14394235     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1439-7641(20021115)3:11<976::AID-CPHC976>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. H. Zewail, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2688; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2586.
2. A. H. Zewail, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2688; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2586.
3. P. H. Bucksbaum, A. Zavriyev, H. G. Muller, D. W. Schmacher, Phys. Rev, Lett. 1990, 64, 1883.
4. L. J. Frasinski, J. H. Posthumus, J. Plumridge, K. Codling, P. F. Taday, A. J. Langley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 3625.
5. A. Giusti-Suzor, F. H. Mies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 3869.
6. B. M. Garraway, K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 932.
7. Z.-G. Sun, N.-Q. Lou, S.-L. Cong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, unpublished work.
8. P. Cremaschi, P. M. Johnson, J. L. Whitten, J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69, 4341.
9. P. Ludowise, M. Blackwell, Y. Chen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 258, 530.
10. J. Xie, B. Jiang, G. Li, S. Yang, J. Xu, G. Sha, D. Xu, N.-Q. Lou, C. Zhang, Faraday Discuss. 2000, 115, 127.
11. M.G. White, M. Seaver, W. A. Chupka, S. D. Colson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 28.
12. H. Rudolph, V. McKoy, J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 2235.
13. J. B. M. Warntjes, F. Robicheaux, J. M. Bakker, L. D. Norrdam, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 2556.
14. P. Felenbok, H. Lefebvre-Brion, Can. J. Phys. 1966, 44, 1677.
15. In this communication, we regard the PES of a cw experiment as the standard, based not only on the concept of the Franck-Condon factor, but also on the theoretical result of our numerical model. See the Supporting Information.
16. R. J. Levis, G. M. Menkir, H. Rabitz, Science 2001, 292, 709.
17. R. B. López-Martens, T. W. Schmidt, G. Roberts, Phys. Rev. A. 2000, 62, 013414, and references therein.
18. V. Engel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 1991, 91, 228.
19. V. Engel, T. Baumert, G. Gerber, Z. Phys. 1993, 28, 37, and references therein.
20. R. deVivie-Riedle, K. Kobe, J. Manz, W. Meyer, B. Reischl, S. Rutz, E. Schreiber, L. Wöste, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 16829.
21. E. Charron, A. Suzor-Weiner, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 3922.
22. Ch. Meier, V. Engel, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 36.
23. B. W. Shore, The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation, Wiley, New York, NY, 1990.
24. C. Amiot, J. Verges, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1980, 81, 424; L. J. LeRoy, University of Waterloo, Chemical Physics Report and the RKR code.
25. J. N. Murrel, S. Carter, S. C. Farantos, P. Huxley, A. J. C. Varandas, Molecular Potential Energy Functions, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1984.
26. F. R. Gillmorre, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1965, 5, 369.
27. K. P. Huber, G. Herzberg, Constants of Diatomic Molecules, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1979.
28. F. P. Billingsley II, J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 864.
29. J. Luque, D. R. Crosley, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 7405.
30. In fact, the details of the B - C admixture adopted in the model barely influence the final result, which verifies that the mixing does not account for the unexpected vibrational peaks! One can find more details about this model in the literature.