Optimal potentials for predicting inter-helical packing in transmembrane proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 342-349

  Dobbs, H ^a   Orlandini, E ^a   Bonaccini, R ^a   Seno, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Membrane protein; Pairwise contact approximation; Perceptron learning; Protein folding; Protein potential

Indexed keywords

BACTERIORHODOPSIN; DIMER; GLYCOPHORIN A; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACIDS; BACTERIORHODOPSINS; GLYCOPHORIN; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY;

EID: 0037110551     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10229     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Popot JL, Engelmann DM. Helical membrane protein folding, stability and evolution. Annu Rev Biochem 2000;69:881-922 and references therein.
2. White SH, Wimley WC. Membrane protein folding and stability: Physical principles. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1999;28:319-365.
3. Brown MF. Modulation of rhodopsin function by properties of the membrane bilayer. Chem Phys Lipids 1994;73:159-180.
4. Popot J-L, Engelman DM. Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: The two-stage model. Biochemistry 1990;29:4031-4037.
5. Orlandini E, Seno F, Banavar JR, Laio A, Maritan A. Deciphering the folding kinetics of transmembrane helical proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:14229-14234.
6. Kahn TW, Engelman DM. Bacteriorhodopsin can be refolded from two independently stable transmembrane helices and the complementary five-helix fragment. Biochemistry 1992;31:6144-6151.
7. Gilles-Gonzales M, Engelman D, Khorana H. Structure-function studies of bacteriorhodopsin XV. J Biol Chem 1991;266:8545-8550.
8. Pilpel Y, Ben-Tal N, Lancet D. kPROT: A knowledge-based scale for the propensity of residue orientation in transmembrane segments. Application to membrane protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1999;294:921-935.
9. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium and long-range interaction parameters between amino-acids for predicting three dimensional structure of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
10. Miyazawa S, Jerningan JL. Estimation of interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structure: Quasi chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552; Miyazawa S, Jerningan JL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
11. Miyazawa S, Jerningan JL. Estimation of interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structure: Quasi chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552; Miyazawa S, Jerningan JL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
12. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potential of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-993; Sippl MJ. Knowledge based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
13. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potential of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-993; Sippl MJ. Knowledge based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
14. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thorton JM. A new approach to protein folding recognition. Nature 1992;358:867-869.
15. Crippen GM. Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation space. Biochemistry 1991;30:4232-4237.
16. Grigorieff N, Ceska TA, Downing KH, Baldwin JM, Henderson R. Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol 1996;259:393-421.
17. Crippen GM. Failures of inverse folding and threading with gapped alignement. Proteins 1996;26:167-171.
18. Seno F, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Interaction potentials for protein folding. Proteins 1998;30:244-248.
19. van Mourik J, Clementi C, Maritan A, Seno F, Banavar JR. Determination of interaction potentials of amino acids from native protein structure: Tests on simple lattice models. J Chem Phys 1999;110:10123-10133.
20. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
21. Bowie JU. Helix packing in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;272:780-789.
22. Bowie JU. Helix-bundle membrane protein fold templates. Prot Sci 1999;8:2711-2719
23. Pappu RV, Marshall GR, Ponder JW. A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:50-55.
24. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt Jr CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983;220:671-680.
25. Bonaccini R. Tesi di Dottorato. Università di Padova. Padova, Italy. 2000.
26. Madras N, Slade G. The Self Avoiding Walk. Boston: Birkauser; 1993. p 287.
27. Krauth W, Mezard M. Learning algorithms with optimal stability in neural networks. J Phys A 1987;20:L745-L752.
28. Dima RI, Settanni G, Micheletti C, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Extraction of interaction potentials between amino-acids from native protein structures. J Chem Phys 2000;112:9151-9166.
29. Vendruscolo M, Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI, Domany E. Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: Perceptron and z-score. Proteins 2000;41:192-201.
30. Micheletti C, Seno F, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques. Proteins 2001;42:422-431.
31. Chang I, Cieplak M, Dima RI, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Protein threading by learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:14350:14355
32. Stevens TJ, Arkin IT. Are membrane proteins "inside-out" proteins? Proteins 1999;36:135-143.
33. Gratkowski H, Lear JD, DeGrado WF. Polar side chains drive the association of model transmembrane peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:880-885.
34. Zhou FX, Merianos HJ, Brunger AT, Engelman DM. Polar residues drive association of polyleucine transmembrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2250-2255.
35. MacKenzie KR, Prestegard JH, Engelman DM. A transmembrane helix dimer: Structure and implications. Science 1997;276:131-133.
36. Contact potentials are available on request from F. Seno (flavio.seno@pd.infn.it).
37. Monge A, Friesner RA, Honig B. An algorithm to generate low-resolution protein tertiary structures from knowledge of secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:5027-5029.