Affective evaluations of and reactions to exterior and interior vehicle auditory quality

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 255, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 501-518

  Västfjäll, Daniel ^a,b   Gulbol, M A ^a   Kleiner, M ^a   Garling T ^b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; VEHICLES;

PRODUCT AUDITORY QUALITY OPTIMIZATION;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING;

EID: 0037104822     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.4166     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. S. Namba 1994 Inter-noise 94, 171-218. Noise-quantity and quality.
2. R. Bisping 1995 SAE Paper, Vol. 951284, 1203-1209, Emotional effect of car interior sounds: pleasantness and power and their relation to acoustic key features.
3. R. Bisping 1997 Acta Acustica 83, 813-818. Car interior sound quality: experimental analysis by synthesis.
4. D. Västfjäll, M. Kleiner and T. Gärling 2001 Report 02-01, Department of Applied Acoustics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. Affective reactions and cognitive evaluations of interior aircraft sound quality.
5. A. Mehrabian and J.A. Russell 1974 An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. J.A. Ballas 1993 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19, 250-267. Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds.
7. A. Gabrielsson and H. Sjögren 1979 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65, 1019-1033. Perceived sound quality of sound reproducing systems.
8. J.M. Grey 1977 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61, 1270-1277. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.
9. R. Guski 1997 Acta Acustica 83, 765-774. Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information.
10. G. Von Bismark 1974 Acustica 30, 159-172. Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds.
11. S. McAdams, S. Winsberg, S. Donnadieu, G. de soete and J. Krimphoff 1995 Psychological Research 58, 177-192. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes.
12. C.E. Osgood, G.J. Suci and P. Tannenbaum 1957 The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13. S. Namba, S. Kuwano, T. Hashimoto, B. Berglund, Z. Da Rui, A. Schick, H. Hoege and M. Florentine 1991 Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 12, 19-29. Verbal expression of emotional impression of sound: a cross-cultural study.
14. L.N. Solomon 1958 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30, 421-425. A semantic approach to the perception of complex sounds.
15. L.N. Solomon 1959 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31, 986-990. Semantic reactions to systematically varied sounds.
16. E.A. Björk 1985 Acustica 57, 185-188. The perceived quality of natural sounds.
17. M.M. Bradley and P.J. Lang 2000 Psychophysiology 37, 204-215. Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli.
18. J.A Russell 1980 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1161-1178. The circumplex model of affect.
19. J.A. Russell and L. Feldman-Barrett 1999 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 805-819. Core affect, prototypical episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant.
20. N.A. Remington, R.F. Fabrigar and P.S. Vlsser 2000 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, 266-300. Reexamining the circumplex model of affect.
21. J.A. Russell and A. Mehrabian 1978 Environment and Behavior 10, 355-387. Approach-avoidance and affiliation as functions of the emotion-eliciting quality of an environment.
22. A. Mehrabian, C. Wihardja and E. Ljunggren 1996 Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs 123, 461-478. Emotional correlates of preferences for situation-activity combinations in everyday life.
23. D. Västfjäll, T. Gärling and M. Kleiner 2001 Journal of Happiness Studies 2, 337-354. How do I like feeling this way? A core affect account of preference for current mood.
24. A.N. Kluger, S. Lewlnsohn and J.R. Aiello 1994 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60, 276-299. The influence of feedback on mood: Linear effects on pleasantness and curvilinear effects on arousal.
25. D. Västfjäll, M. Friman, T. Gärling and M. Kleiner 2001 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 43, 19-31. The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex.
26. D. Västfjäll and T. Gärling 2001 Göteborg Psychological Reports, Vol. 9 (1), Department of Psychology, Göteborg University, Sweden. Development and validation of short measures of valence and activation: the Swedish core affect scales (SCAS) II.
27. E. Zwicker and H. Fastl 1999 Psychoacoustics - Facts and models. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, second edition.
28. C.A. Schreiber and D. Kahneman 2000 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129, 27-42. Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.
29. S. Kuwano and S. Namba 1985 Psychological Research 47, 27-37. Continuous judgment of level-fluctuating sounds and the relationship with overall loudness and instantaneous loudness.
30. P. Susini and S. McAdams 2000 Acta Acustica 85, 515-525. Psychophysical validation of a proprioceptive device by cross-modal matching of loudness.
31. E. Schubert 1999 Australian Journal of Psychology 51, 154-165. Measuring emotion continuously: Validity and reliability of the two-dimensional emotion-space.
32. M.M. Bradley and P.J. Lang 1999 Technical Report, Vol. B-2, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida. International affective digitized sounds (IADS): stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings.