Are temperature-sensitive proxies adequate for North Atlantic Oscillation reconstructions?

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 29, Issue 14, 2002, Pages

  Zorita, E ^a   Gonzalez Rouco F ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; REPAIR;

AIR TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE SIMULATION; EXTERNAL FORCING; NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATION INDICES; NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATIONS; SOLAR VARIABILITY; STATISTICAL APPROACH; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE;

CLIMATE MODELS;

EID: 0037101712     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002GL015404     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Appenzeller, C., T. F. Stocker, and, M. Arklin, North Atlantic oscillation dynamics recorded in Greenland ice cores, Science, 282, 446-449, 1998.
2. Cook, E. R., R. D. D'Arrigo, and, K. R. Briffa, A reconstruction of the North Atlantic Oscillation using tree-ring chronologies from North America and Europe, The Holocene, 8, 9-17, 1998.
3. Crowley, T. J., Causes of climate change over the last 1000 years, Science, 289, 270-277, 2000.
4. Fyfe, J. C., G. J. Boer, and, G. M. Flato, The Arctic and Antarctic Oscillations and their projected changes under global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1601-1604, 1999.
5. Hastenrath, S., and, L. Greischar, The North Atlantic oscillation in the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis, J. Climate, 14, 2404-2413, 2001.
6. Hurrell, J. W., Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation, Science, 269, 676-679, 1995.
7. Kalnay, E., et al., The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437-471, 1996.
8. Jones, P. D., T. Jonssont, and, D. Wheeler, Extension of the North Atlantic Oscillation using early instrumental pressure observations from Gibraltar and South-West Iceland, Int. J. Climatology, 17, 1433-1450, 1997.
9. Legutke, S., and, R. Voss, The Hamburg Atmosphere-Ocean Coupled Circulation Model ECHO-G. Technical Report No. 18, DKRZ, Hamburg, 1999.
10. Luterbacher, J., C. Schmutz, D. Gyalistras, E. Xoplaki, and, H. Wanner, Reconstruction of monthly NAO and EU indices back to AD 1675, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1135-1138, 2000.
11. Luterbacher, J., et al., Reconstruction of sea level pressure fields over the Eastern North Atlantic and Europe back to 1500, Clim. Dyn., 18, 545-561, 2002.
12. Rodwell, M. J., D. P. Rowell, and, C. K. Folland, Oceanic forcing of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation and European climate, Nature, 398, 320-323, 1999.
13. Shindell, D. T., R. L. Miller, G. A. Smith, and, L. Pandolfo, Simulation of the Arctic Oscillation trend by greenhouse forcing of a stratospheric model, Nature, 399, 453-455, 1999.
14. Schmutz, C., J. Luterbacher, D. Gyalistras, E. Xoplaki, and, H. Wanner, Can we trust proxy-based NAO index reconstructions? Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2745-2748, 1999.
15. von Storch, H., and, F. Zwiers, Statistical Analysis in Climate Research, Cambridge University Press, 484 pp., 1999.
16. Zorita, E., and, F. Gonzalez-Rouco, Disagreement between predictions of the future behavior of the Arctic Oscillation as simulated in two different climate models: Implications for global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1755-1758, 2000.