Total hip prosthesis: Structure of a long-term follow-up;Prothèse totale de hanche: Structure d'un suivi à long terme

Medecine et Hygiene

Volumn 60, Issue 2417, 2002, Pages 2353-2357

  Lubbeke A ^a   Sadri, H ^a   Barea B ^a   Peter, R ^a   Hoffmeyer, P ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIC; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037065427     PISSN: 00256749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 497-506.
2. Laupacis A, Boume R, Rorabeck C, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75-A: 1619-26.
3. Puolakka T, Pajamäki K, Halonen P, et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 43341.
4. Fumes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, et al. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83-B: 57986.
5. Söderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register (Thesis). Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (Suppl. 296): 1-12.
6. Fender D, Harper WM, Gregg PJ, The Trent regional arthroplasty study. Experiences with a hip register. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82-B: 944-7.
7. Pellicci PM, Tria AJ, Garvin KL. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000.
8. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD, A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity, Med Care 1996; 34: 220-33.
9. Chamley J, Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979; 246.
10. Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P, Specific or general health outcome mesures in the evaluation of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-B: 600-6.
11. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic Prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 36-A: 451-75.
12. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51-A: 737-55.
13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation Study of WOMAC: A health instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40.
14. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and the operative findings at the bonecement junction of the socket in Chamley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1988; 228: 105-9.
15. Harris WH, McCarthy JC, O'Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64-A: 1063-7.
16. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassmann AH, Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69-B: 45-55.