The dynamic behavior of CheW from Thermotoga maritima in solution, as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance: Implications for potential protein-protein interaction sites

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 101, Issue 102, 2002, Pages 359-373

  Griswold, Ian J ^a   Dahlquist, Frederick W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemotaxis; CheW; Dynamics; NMR; Relaxation

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHEW PROTEIN, BACTERIA; CHEW PROTEIN; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; THERMOTOGA MARITIMA; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SCALE UP; TIME;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; THERMOTOGA MARITIMA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); THERMOTOGA; THERMOTOGA MARITIMA;

EID: 0037058897     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00157-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Parkinson J.S. Signal transduction schemes of bacteria. Cell. 73:1993;857-871.
2. Appleby J.L., Parkinson J.S., Bourret R.B. Signal transduction via the multi-step phosphorelay: not necessarily a road less traveled. Cell. 86:1996;845-848.
3. Berg H.C., Brown D.A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 239:1972;500-504.
4. Macnab R.M., Koshland D.E. Jr. The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 69:1972;2509-2512.
5. Falke J.J., Bass R.B., Butler S.L., Chervitz S.A., Danielson M.A. The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:1997;457-512.
6. Hoch J.A. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:2000;165-170.
7. Stock A.M., Robinson V.L., Goudreau P.N. Two-component signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:2000;183-215.
8. Milburn M.V., Prive G.G., Milligan D.L., et al. Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. Science. 254:1991;1342-1347.
9. McNally D.F., Matsumura P. Bacterial chemotaxis signaling complexes: formation of a CheA/CheW complex enhances autophosphorylation and affinity for CheY. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:1991;6269-6273.
10. Eisenbach M., Caplan S.R. Bacterial chemotaxis: unsolved mystery of the flagellar switch. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;444-446.
11. Eisenbach M. Control of bacterial chemotaxis. Mol. Microbiol. 20:1996;903-910.
12. Conley M.P., Wolfe A.J., Blair D.F., Berg H.C. Both CheA and CheW are required for reconstitution of chemotactic signaling in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 171:1989;5190-5193.
13. Bren A., Eisenbach M. How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation. J. Bacteriol. 182:2000;6865-6873.
14. Gegner J.A., Graham D.R., Roth A.F., Dahlquist F.W. Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Cell. 70:1992;975-982.
15. Liu Y., Levit M., Lurz R., Surette M.G., Stock J.B. Receptor-mediated protein kinase activation and the mechanism of transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J. 16:1997;7231-7240.
16. Maddock J.R., Shapiro L. Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. Science. 259:1993;1717-1723.
17. Griswold I.J., Zhou H., Matison M., et al. The solution structure and interactions of CheW from Thermotoga maritima. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:2002;121-125.
18. Liu J.D., Parkinson J.S. Genetic evidence for interaction between the CheW and Tsr proteins during chemoreceptor signaling by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 173:1991;4941-4951.
19. Boukhvalova M., Dahlquist F.W., Stewart R.C. CheW binding interactions with CheA and Tar: importance for chemotaxis signaling in Esherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;22251-22259.
20. Swanson R.V., Sanna M.G., Simon M.I. Thermostable chemotaxis proteins from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. J. Bacteriol. 178:1996;484-489.
21. 15N NMR relaxation. Biochemistry. 33:1994;5984-6003.
22. 2O in protein NMR. Application to sensitivity enhancement and NOE measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:1993;12593-12594.
23. Abragam A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. 1961;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
24. Clore G.M., Szabo A., Bax A., Key L.E., Driscoll P.C., Gronenborn A.M. Deviations from the simple two-parameter model-free approach to the interpretation of nitrogen-15 nuclear magnetic relaxation of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;4989-4991.
25. Lipari G., Szabo A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:1982;4546-4559.
26. Lipari G., Szabo A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:1982;4559-4570.
27. 13C heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:1991;4371-4380.
28. 15N inverse-detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 28:1989;8972-8979.
29. Mandel A.M., Akke M., Palmer A.G. Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 246:1995;144-163.
30. Bilwes A.M., Alex L.A., Crane B.R., Simon M.I. Structure of CheA, a signal-transducing histidine kinase. Cell. 96:1999;131-141.
31. Phillips C.L., Stark M.R., Johnson A.D., Dahlquist F.W. Heterodimerization of the yeast homeodomain transcriptional regulators alpha 2 and a1 induces an interfacial helix in alpha 2. Biochemistry. 33:1994;9294-9302.
32. Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;54-60.
33. Mulder F.A., Mittermaier A., Hon B., Dahlquist F.W., Kay L.E. Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;932-935.
34. Feher V.A., Cavanagh J. Millisecond-time scale motions contribute to the function of the bacterial response regulator protein Spo0F. Nature. 400:1999;289-293.
35. Eisenmesser E.Z., Bosco D.A., Akke M., Kern D. Enzyme dynamics during catalysis. Science. 295:2002;1520-1523.
36. Kern D., Volkman B.F., Luginbuhl P., Nohaile M.J., Kustu S., Wemmer D.E. Structure of a transiently phosphorylated switch in bacterial signal transduction. Nature. 402:1999;894-898.
37. Volkman B.F., Lipson D., Wemmer D.E., Kern D. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science. 291:2001;2429-2433.
38. Shimizu T.S., Le Novere N., Levin M.D., Beavil A.J., Sutton B.J., Bray D. Molecular model of a lattice of signaling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:2000;792-796.
39. Koradi R., Billeter M., Wuthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14:1996;29-32 Also pp. 51-55.